Media exposure and attention as mediating variables influencing social risk judgments

By Michael D. Slater, K. Rasinski. 2005

116 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Applied Psychology, Literature and Literary Theory, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/3af8c155e4adf4960cf62ea198abafda5eeeaae6

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Applied Psychology

1. Kristopher J Preacher
2. Andrew F. Hayes
3. U. Foehr
4. T. Beehr
5. Minseop Kim
6. Nicholas J. Rockwood
7. M. Bellibaş
8. Annika Abell

In Literature and Literary Theory

1. Andrew F. Hayes
2. Kristopher J Preacher
3. U. Foehr

In Sociology and Political Science

1. Kristopher J Preacher
2. Andrew F. Hayes
3. U. Foehr
4. Jennifer S. Mueller
5. Patti M. Valkenburg
6. Jochen Peter
7. Scott S. Wiltermuth
8. F. Sirois

Citations in the corpus

• Contemporary approaches to assessing mediation in communication research. (2008, background): “Additional examples of multiple mediator models in the communication literature include Kiousis, McDevitt, and Wu (2005), Slater and Rasinski (2005), and Holbert et al. (2003).”
• MEDIA MULTITASKING AMONG AMERICAN YOUTH: PREVALENCE, PREDICTORS AND PAIRINGS (2006, methodology): “While the comprehensive sensation-seeking scale is comprised of dozens of items and several subscales (zuckerman, 1964), researchers often use two or three items as a proxy for the general concept (slater & Rasinski, 2005).”