Knowledge‐processing capabilities and innovative performance: an empirical study
By Ari Jantunen. 2005
399 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Management Science and Operations Research, Strategy and Management
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/3a4ad3df8a3d04de5ff90c8a124e9c480d9c1087
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Management Science and Operations Research
- Ralf Wilden
- M. Ruiz‐Ortega
- Juan Gabriel Cegarra-Navarro
- Pedro Manuel Garcia-Villaverde
- Gloria Parra‐Requena
- Job Rodrigo-Alarcón
- Hsiu-Fen Lin
- Ian Lings
In Strategy and Management
- Siegfried P. Gudergan
- Ralf Wilden
- Agnes Asemokha
- Jackson Musona
- Pedro Soto‐Acosta
- M. Ruiz‐Ortega
- Juan Gabriel Cegarra-Navarro
- Pedro Manuel Garcia-Villaverde
Citations in the corpus
- Knowledge sharing and firm innovation capability: an empirical study (2007, background): “The generation of new ideas and the improvement of firm products, because of a better absorptive capacity, could improve innovation performance (Jantunen, 2005).”
- The Effect of Absorptive Capacity on Innovativeness: Context and Information Systems Capability as Catalysts (2010, neutral): “This is crucial because companies with superior knowledge-processing practices are likely to sustain their knowledge configurations and thus be better positioned in long-term competition (Jantunen, 2005).”
- Business model innovation and entrepreneurial orientation relationships in SMEs: Implications for international performance (2019, background): “An organization that is actively innovating and audacious in implementing and coordinating novel strategies have superior performance in both the domestic and foreign market (Lumpkin and Dess 2001; Jantunen et al. 2005; Jantunen 2005).”
- From social capital to entrepreneurial orientation: The mediating role of dynamic capabilities (2017, background): “Thus, DCs lead firms to effectively exploit the knowledge gained from their SC (Jantunen, 2005), enabling firms to recognize and interpret the new perspectives, opportunities, and the most suitable alternatives through the firm's SC (Atuahene-Gima & Murray, 2007).”
- Dynamic capabilities and performance : strategy, structure and environment (2013, methodology): “We found an existing scale to assess “reconfiguring” (Jantunen et al., 2005), which is based on the renewal activities listed in the Community Innovation Surveys (CIS) of the European Union. For sensing and seizing, we compiled items drawn from relevant existing literature. For “sensing,” we supplem”
- Structured knowledge processes and firm performance: The role of organizational agility (2016, background): “Many terms describe the process of KAp: knowledge leverage (Ipe, 2003); knowledge use (Earl, 2001); and knowledge utilization (Jantunen, 2005).”