Comprehensive criteria to judge validity and reliability of qualitative research within the realism paradigm

By M. Healy, Chad Perry. 2000

1,436 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/3a3e356420f72e9624a9e1d87de84da070f7d114

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

Citations in the corpus

Generation Z consumers' expectations of interactions in smart retailing: A future agenda (2017, methodology): “This research approach was used since it provides richer and deeper information for exploring viewpoints, allowing the researchers to reach a better initial understanding of the problem and identify phenomena attitude influences (e.g. Healy & Perry, 2000; Maxwell, 1996).”
Multicultural influences on group learning: a qualitative higher education study (2008, background): “The realism paradigm enables exploration of pre‐existing realities (Healy & Perry 2000 ); in this case the existing and adapted 3P models.”
Quality in Qualitative Studies: The Case of Validity, Reliability and Generalizability (2011, background): “See Chapple and Rogers (1998), Klein and Myers (1999), Healy and Perry (2000) and Lilford, Edward, Braunholtz, Jackson, Thornton and Hewison (2001).”
Corporate Social Responsibility and Corporate Governance: Role of Context in International Settings (2013, background): “This interpretive paradigm is appropriate in situations where the researcher is attempting to study real-life experiences by participation to better understand and express its values, details and features (Healy and Perry 2000).”
Research design and data analysis in realism research (2006, background): “Other issues in realism research, for example, arguments about philosophical details (Hunt, 1994; Zinkhan and Hirscheim, 1992) or how to judge the quality of realism research (Healy and Perry, 2000; Thompson and Perry, 2004) have been dealt with elsewhere.”
Validity and reliability tests in case study research: a literature review with “hands‐on” applications for each research phase (2003, background): “Furthermore, Healy and Perry (2000) established six specific criteria to judge the validity and reliability of case study research, within the realism paradigm.”
Making Paradigms Meaningful in Mixed Methods Research (2016, background): “Thus, while there may be multiple perspectives on a single event or object (Healy & Perry, 2000), critical realism also recognizes that there are realities that cannot not be known (Guba, 1990).”
Understanding Reliability and Validity in Qualitative Research (2003, neutral): “In this view, Healy and Perry (2000) explicate on the judging validity and reliability within the realism paradigm which relies on multiple perceptions about a single reality.”