Predicting the Prison Misconducts of Women Offenders
By E. Wright, Emily J. Salisbury, P. van Voorhis. 2007
168 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Clinical Psychology, General Health Professions, Sociology and Political Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/f936c63aad8445ae478f734cdd7275d9438f4fa9
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Clinical Psychology
In General Health Professions
In Sociology and Political Science
Citations in the corpus
- Sacrosanct or Flawed: Risk, Accountability and Gender- Responsive Penal Politics (2010, background): “This research is typically positioned as improving systems for women, who tend to be misclassified into higher risk categories when instruments developed for the male prison population are used (Wright et al. 2007; Van Voorhis and Presser 2001; Blanchette and Brown 2006).”
- The Effects of Mental Health and Substance Abuse Disorders on Institutional Misconduct Among Female Inmates (2012, background): “further complicated by gender-specific needs and risks (Wright et al., 2007).”
- Parenting Stress, Alliance, Child Contact, and Adjustment of Imprisoned Mothers and Fathers (2009, result): “Gender comparisons have generally indicated a pattern, consistent with that in the free world, of high levels of internalizing disorders such as depression and anxiety disorder among incarcerated women (Wright, Salisbury, & Van Voorhis, 2007 ), and high levels of externalizing problems such as viol”