EMS-based Environmental Regimes as Club Goods: Examining Variations in Firm-level Adoption of ISO 14001 and EMAS in U.K., U.S. and Germany

By Kelly Kolln, Aseem Prakash. 2002

191 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Marketing, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/39bccfe694cf08889d921b843883c8dc953f000d

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Marketing

In Strategy and Management

Citations in the corpus

The Regulation Dilemma: Cooperation and Conflict in Environmental Governance (2004, background): “Not surprisingly then, self-policing and voluntary codes seem to be more popular in some sectors/industries than in others, and trade associations seemed to have played a critical role in this respect (Haufler, 2001; Kollman and Prakash, 2002).”
Regulation and firm perception, eco-innovation and firm performance (2012, background): “…is a voluntary framework which creates awareness within firms (Rehfeld et al. 2007), assesses their impact on the environment (Darnall 2006), stimulates them to eco-innovate (Rehfeld et al. 2007), and in some cases helps them get ahead of existing government regulations (Kollman and Prakash 2002).”
In the name of corporate social responsibility (2004, background): “procedures for environmental management (18, 73 ).”
Assessing non-financial reports according to the Global Reporting Initiative guidelines: evidence from Greece (2010, background): “While the adoption of voluntary system standards and initiatives represents a new form of governance in which governments play a more limited role resulting in an extremely fragmented and decentralized form of policy-making (Kollman and Prakash, 2002), this form of policy-making has been slow to tak”
On the Drivers of Eco-Innovations: Empirical Evidence from the UK (2012, background): “Their purpose is to continuously improve corporate environmental performance so as to get ahead of the existing government regulations to reduce emissions and waste disposal (Kollman and Prakash, 2002).”
What Explains the Uneven Take-Up of ISO 14001 at the Global Level? A Panel-Data Analysis (2004, background): “Following this approach, the very different certification counts in Europe and the USA are explained in terms of the distinctive demand-side and supply-side characteristics of the national institutional environments.”
Geographic Variations in the Early Diffusion of Corporate Voluntary Standards: Comparing ISO 14001 and the Global Compact (2010, background): “CR standards are nonstate mandated regulatory institutions governing the behavior of firms (Cashore, 2002; Christopherson and Lillie, 2005; Hebb and Wöjcik, 2005; Kollman and Prakash, 2002).”
Stimulating Different Types of Eco-Innovation in the UK: Government Policies and Firm Motivations (2011, background): “EMS are aimed at the continuous improvement of corporate environmental performance with an attempt to get ahead of the existing government regulations to reduce emissions and waste disposal (Kollman and Prakash, 2002).”