U.S. News & World Report College Rankings: Modeling Institutional Effects on Organizational Reputation

By Michael N. Bastedo, Nicholas A. Bowman. American Journal of Education, 2009

191 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Education, Political Science and International Relations, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/39a4e19a5988b9a3f26c42271c4a3ea24c8218e3

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Education

In Political Science and International Relations

In Strategy and Management

Citations in the corpus

College Rankings as an Interorganizational Dependency: Establishing the Foundation for Strategic and Institutional Accounts (2011, background): “Reputation is clearly an organizational resource in higher education that has been, and is increasingly defined by, the formal structure of rankings (Bastedo and Bowman 2010; Sauder 2006).”
Running in Place: Low-Income Students and the Dynamics of Higher Education Stratification (2011, background): “Published college rankings also have a significant impact on future peer assessments, independent of any real changes in organizational quality and performance and controlling for prior peer assessments of reputation (Bastedo & Bowman, 2010; Bowman & Bastedo, 2011).”
Defined by Outcomes or Culture? Constructing an Organizational Identity for Hispanic-Serving Institutions (2017, background): “While researchers have extensively used institutional theory (e.g., Bastedo & Bowman, 2010; Birnbaum, 1983; Gonzales, 2013; Morphew & Huisman, 2002) and theories of organizational culture (e.g., Kezar & Eckel, 2002; Kuh & Whitt, 1988; Tierney, 1988) to study institutions of higher education, few…”
Anchoring effects in world university rankings: exploring biases in reputation scores (2011, background): “When also considering the fact that the differences between rankings and reputation are becoming vanishingly small over time (Bastedo and Bowman 2010; Stake 2006) and that rankings are highly stable over time (Bowman and Bastedo 2009; Usher and Savino 2006), it is difficult to maintain the fantasy t”