IMPROVING THE STUDENTS
By Gigin Sappena Ginting. 2013
253 citations recorded by the source corpus.
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/39053ebef8d86f8f71584544ad76beaf8d0ffbcb
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- Logan Fiorella
- Richard E. Mayer
- Garvin Brod
- Ludmila D. Nunes
- Jane Blunt
- P. Agarwal
- Guido Makransky
- Roxana Moreno
Citations in the corpus
- Generative Learning: Which Strategies for What Age? (2020, background): “among elements of the to-be-learned content (Dunlosky et al. 2013).”
- Retrieval Practice Consistently Benefits Student Learning: a Systematic Review of Applied Research in Schools and Classrooms (2019, methodology): “…in both laboratory and applied research (including research in the current review) that retrieval practice significantly increases student learning when compared to re-read exposure controls (e.g., Atabek Yigit et al. 2014; Dunlosky et al. 2013; McDermott et al. 2014; Roediger and Karpicke 2006a).”
- Eight Ways to Promote Generative Learning (2016, background): “Previous reviews of learning strategies (Dembo and Junge 2005; Dunlosky et al. 2013; Nist and Holschuh 2000; Pressley et al. 1995; Weinstein and Mayer 1986) are often more broad to include strategies that are not effective or that target rote learning (e.g., rereading, highlighting, underlining) or…”