Cognitive stimulation and interference in groups: Exposure effects in an idea generation task

By B. Nijstad, Wolfgang Stroebe, H. Lodewijkx. 2002

374 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Communication, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/38e37cf2f119736eb0b3de424135a3f07209733a

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Communication

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

In Social Psychology

Citations in the corpus

How Dual-Identity Processes Foster Creativity (2014, background): “This type of skill is central to creativity (De Dreu et al., 2008; Nijstad et al., 2010; Nijstad, 2002).”
Group performance and decision making. (2004, result): “…the stimulating effect of exposure to others’ ideas, a suggestion that (a) has been supported in several recent studies (Leggett-Dugosh et al. 2000, Nijstad et al. 2003, Paulus & Yang 2000; although also see Ziegler et al. 2000) and (b) all else being equal, encourages…”
Beyond productivity loss in brainstorming groups: The evolution of a question (2010, methodology): “These hypotheses were tested using the data from the control groups of four different experiments (Nijstad et al., 2002, 2003).”
How are we creative together? Comparing sociocognitive and sociocultural answers (2011, background): “The underlying assumptions of SIAM have been tested in several studies (see Nijstad et al., 2002, Nijstad and Stroebe, 2006) and are reflected in current attempts to simulate creativity processes with the help of semantic networks (e.g. Paulus and Brown, 2003).”
Inspiration and fixation: Questions, methods, findings, and challenges (2016, background): “As a result, participants can increase their productivity when category changes occur as fast as the repetition of similar ideas within a category (Nijstad et al., 2002).”
The dual pathway to creativity model: Creative ideation as a function of flexibility and persistence (2010, background): “Nijstad, Stroebe, and Lodewijkx (2002, 2003) proposed that, when ideas are categorised in conceptual categories, one can not only establish flexibility (i.e., count the number of categories that are used), but also see how many ideas have been generated in each of the categories.”
Crowdsourcing New Product Ideas over Time: An Analysis of the Dell IdeaStorm Community (2013, methodology): “Moreover, Nijstad et al. (2002) ﬁnd that individuals generate more diverse ideas after attending to stimulus ideas from a diverse set of categories.”
Motivated Information Processing in Group Judgment and Decision Making (2008, background): “creative group performance (Dugosh, Paulus, Roland, & Yang, 2000; Nijstad et al., 2002) because it helps group members build on these ideas.”