Emotional Reactions to a Seemingly Prejudiced Response: The Role of Automatically Activated Racial Attitudes and Motivation to Control Prejudiced Reactions

By R. Fazio, L. Hilden. 2001

89 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/38cadc030eb20b0f97ac31e6e829f4587c9fad05

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Social Psychology

In Sociology and Political Science

Citations in the corpus

TARGET ARTICLE: Attributions of Implicit Prejudice, or "Would Jesse Jackson 'Fail' the Implicit Association Test?" (2004, unknown): “Using the affective priming procedure Fazio and Hilden (2001) were able to predict emotional reactions to a public service ad that led viewers to draw an unwarranted and prejudiced conclusion.”
Subgroup prejudice based on skin color among Hispanics in the United States and Latin America (2002, background): “…either because participants consciously and genuinely endorsed egalitarian attitudes, or because they wanted to avoid appearing prejudiced to the experimenter, or both of the above (Dunton & Fazio, 1997; Fazio & Hilden, 2001; Monin & Miller, 2001; Plant & Devine, 1998; Schuette & Fazio, 1995).”
Activating and Suppressing Hostile and Benevolent Racism: Evidence for Comparative Media Stereotyping (2007, unknown): “Benevolent prejudice is manifest as feelings of sympathy, pity, sadness, amusement, and guilt toward out-groups (Fazio & Hilden, 2001; Fiske, Cuddy, Glick, & Xu, 2002; Swim & Miller, 1999).”
Trait Inferences as a Function of Automatically Activated Racial Attitudes and Motivation to Control Prejudiced Reactions (2004, background): “Regarding sociopolitical orientations, a recent study showed that the concern factor related strongly to humanitarianism-egalitarianism r = .50, to which the restraint factor bore no relationship r = –.01 (Fazio & Hilden, 2001).”
Implicit measures in social cognition. research: their meaning and use. (2003, unknown): “Using a priming measure of racial attitudes, Fazio & Hilden (2001) predicted participants’ emotional reactions to a public service ad that evoked a seemingly prejudiced response.”
Implicit Ingroup Favoritism, Outgroup Favoritism, and Their Behavioral Manifestations (2004, background): “…I.4 Some of them directly replicated and extended Fazio and colleagues’ initial finding in several ways (Dovidioet al., 1997, Experiment 3; Dovidioet al., 2002; Fazio and Hilden, 2001; McConnell and Leibold, 2001; Rudman and Lee, 2003, Experiment 2; Sekaquaptewae al., 2003, Experiments 1 and 2).”
Perceptions of non-target confronters in response to racist and heterosexist remarks (2012, background): “Studies have shown that confrontation increases self-directed negative affect (Czopp & Monteith, 2003) and feelings of guilt (Fazio & Hilden, 2001) in the commenter, which leads to a reduction in the commenter’s prejudice level (Czopp & Monteith, 2003).”