此处“personality”译法探析

By J. Leicester. 2000

1,693 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Applied Psychology, Clinical Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/389df79b6f1f3de7507e5fcee415e9728b888682

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Applied Psychology

In Clinical Psychology

Citations in the corpus

The Extended iSelf: The Impact of iPhone Separation on Cognition, Emotion, and Physiology (2015, background): “Similar to McClelland (1951), Clark (2008) provides a scenario about a skilled carpenter and his hammer to explain the idea of negotiable body.”
No Character or Personality (2003, background): “Solomon refers to Funder (2001), a bravely upbeat review of the current (utterly dismal) state of personality psychology that nevertheless sort of acknowledges that personality psychology has collapsed as an academic subject.”
Noncognitive Skills, Occupational Attainment, and Relative Wages (2009, methodology): “…(1978) Mastery Scale was administered in waves 3 and 4 providing us with a measure of locus of control (self-efficacy), while individuals responded to a series of personality questions in wave 5 allowing us to utilise a taxonomy of personality known as the Big Five (see Caprara and Cervone, 2000).”
A Revised Writer(s)-Within-Community Model of Writing (2018, background): “Personality is defined as “relatively stable individual differences in behavioral dispositions that generalize across a range of environments” (Zeidner & Matthews, 2012, p. 111).”
The Psychology of Self‐defense: Self‐Affirmation Theory (2006, background): “If self‐aYrmation enables people to view otherwise threatening events, such as negative health information, as less threatening, then one intriguing possibility is that it could also reduce evaluative stress.”
Attachment dimensions and the big five personality traits: Associations and comparative ability to predict relationship quality (2006, background): “204 E.E. Noftle, P.R. Shaver / Journal of Research in Personality 40 (2006) 179–208 In his recent Annual Review of Psychology chapter on personality, Funder (2001) noted that many personality constructs can be mapped onto the Big Five, but not every personality construct can be derived from the Big…”
A Rose by Any Name? The Values Construct (2000, background): “For example, no discussion of value theory appears in a sample of introductory social psychology and personality textbooks published in this decade (Aronson, Wilson, & Akert, 1997; Baron & Byrne, 1997; Burger, 1997; Carducci, 1998; Cloninger, 1996; Hewstone, Stroebe, & Stephenson, 1996; Liebert & Li”
The Big Five Personality Factors and Personal Values (2002, background): “Researchers have suggested that traits and motives are two distinct elements of personality (see Winter et al., 1998) and that each may predict different sorts of behavior (e.g., McClelland, 1951).”
Why Do People Regulate Their Emotions? A Taxonomy of Motives in Emotion Regulation (2016, background): “perform well, to know, to relate, and to be autonomous (e.g., Deci & Ryan, 1991; Erikson, 1959; Fiske, 2003; Forbes, 2011; Higgins, 2014; Maslow, 1943; McClelland, 1951; McDougall, 1908; H. A. Murray, 1938).”
A Critique of Positive Psychology—or ‘The New Science of Happiness’ (2008, background): “Moreover, there appears to be a strong hereditary influence at work and genetic research promises more discoveries relating particular traits (especially abnormal ones) to individual genes or genetic configurations (see Matthews et al., 2003; Eysenck, 1998, p. 452).”
The Latent Structure and Measurement Invariance of Scores on the Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking–Figural (2006, background): “Since Guilford (1959, 1962) conceptualized divergent thinking as multidimensional, many researchers have concluded that creativity consisted of several independent psychological factors.”
Honesty–Humility and a Person–Situation Interaction at Work (2010, background): “Indeed, Funder (2001) proposed that investigations of personality should generally comprise consideration of the person, the situation, and behaviour.”
Public Service Motivation, User Orientation, and Job Satisfaction: A Question of Employment Sector? (2013, background): “Based on McClelland’s (1951) needs theory, one’s job will lead to this state if it allows fulfillment of the psychological needs for achievement, power, and affiliation.”
PERSOC: A Unified Framework for Understanding the Dynamic Interplay of Personality and Social Relationships (2011, background): “Similarly, personality research has long been reluctant to study social real-life phenomena (see Funder, 2001, 2009).”
Generalized Low Rank Models (2014, methodology): “The following code loads the MSQ data set and encodes it in two dimensions: using RDatasets using LowRankModels # pick a data set df = RDatasets.dataset("psych","msq") # encode it!”
Core and Surface Characteristics for the Description and Theory of Personality Differences and Development (2014, background): “…to personality include physical fea(e.g. attractiveness) and ability-related characteristics (e.g. intelligence) mponents of personality (e.g. Guilford, 1959), most perspectives on nality explicitly disentangle personality characteristics from cognitive es and from non-psychological…”
Personality, Punishment and Public Goods: Strategic Shifts towards Cooperation as a Matter of Dispositional Honesty–Humility (2012, background): “In this very vein, Funder (2001, 2009), like many others, has pointed out that most will be gained from explaining behaviour through the person, the situation and the interaction of both.”