Why Assessment Illiteracy Is Professional Suicide.
By W. Popham. 2004
128 citations recorded by the source corpus.
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/383e9dff52ea2a974ede53aefceaf9dd2cbdc4e8
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
Citations in the corpus
- Writing Assessment Literacy: Surveying Second Language Teachers' Knowledge, Beliefs, and Practices (2016, background): “For second language writing eachers to become assessment literate, they need guidance in those aspects of assessment involving scoring, grading, and aking judgments about students (Popham, 2004; Taylor, 2010; Volante & Fazio, 2007; Weigle, 2007; White, 2009).”
- Language assessment training in Hong Kong: Implications for language assessment literacy (2015, background): “Since 1991, not much progress has been made as more than a decade later, Popham (2004)”
- Pedagogies for Preservice Assessment Education: Supporting Teacher Candidates' Assessment Literacy Development (2013, unknown): “E-mail: cdeluca@queensu.ca 128 literacy levels (DeLuca, Klinger, Searle, & Shulha, 2010; Graham, 2005; Popham, 2004, 2011).”
- Language assessment literacy: an uncharted area for the English language teachers in Bangladesh (2019, background): “Keywords: Language assessment literacy (LAL), English language teaching (ELT), Testoriented context, Bangladesh Introduction Popham (2004) once labeled teachers’ lack of appropriate training in assessment as “professional suicide” (p. 82).”