Invited Editorial: The Four Theories of Profit and Their Joint Effects
By Richard Makadok. 2011
119 citations recorded by the source corpus.
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/3777be66045783dea2343e484cbc57aedeccf60d
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- Paul Louis Drnevich
- David C. Croson
- M. Becerra
- Rosario Silva
- Anita M. McGahan
- Juan Santaló
- Tomi Heimonen
Citations in the corpus
- Information Technology and Business-Level Strategy: Toward an Integrated Theoretical Perspective (2013, background): “…evolved fairly recently, but trace their roots back to Ricardo's (1817) arguments on resource scarcity, Penrose's (1959) theory of firm growth, and Demsetz's (1973, 1974 ) arguments about the theoretical insufficiency of the S-C-P paradigm (as discussed previously and noted in Makadok 2010, 2011).”
- Integrating Insights From the Resource-Based View of the Firm Into the New Stakeholder Theory (2021, background): “Similarly, the resource-based view categorization of the choices made within organizations to appropriate value (Barney, 1991; Mahoney, 2001; Makadok, 2011; Penrose, 1959; Peteraf, 1993) can be integrated with both the human-capital development and sustainability streams of the NST in a unifying…”
- Being better vs. being different: differentiation, competition, and pricing strategies in the Spanish hotel industry. (2013, background): “In a sequence of theoretical papers, Makadok and Ross (2009), Makadok (2010, 2011) predicted the performance consequences of both types of differentiation as well as their interaction effects, though there is scarce empirical research in strategy about both types of differentiation.”