Instruction Based on Cooperative Learning

By R. Slavin. 2010

378 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Developmental and Educational Psychology, Education

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/376a4f1cbbc97e915117149faa0491cd167786a6

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Developmental and Educational Psychology

In Education

Citations in the corpus

Effects of Cooperative Learning on Students at An Giang University in Vietnam. (2012, background): “…studies (Yamarik, 2007; Kilic, 2008; Doymus, 2008a&b; Adeyemi, 2008; Sahin, 2010; Doymus, Karacop & Simsek, 2010; Bertucci, Conte, Johnson, & Johnson, 2010; Slavin, 2011) which report that students in CL groups have higher adjusted posttest mean scores than those in conventional lecture groups.”
The Effects of Cooperative Learning on the Academic Achievement and Knowledge Retention (2014, background): “In comparison with cooperative learning techniques, lecture-based teaching has been reported to be less effective to the demands of high rates of cognitive and affective outcomes (Slavin, 2011).”
Effects of Cooperative Learning on Students' Academic Achievement (2015, background): “Cooperative learning can be defined as a teaching method that involves students in learning process in order to understand and learn content of the subject (Slavin, 2011).”
Teaching in a Digital Age: How Educators Use Technology to Improve Student Learning (2016, background): “…or segmenting of learning [8,9] • To promote self-guided or “discovery” learning [10, 11] • For collaborative and cooperative learning [12,13,14] • To facilitate student-centered, active learning [15,16,17] When technology is used to remodel learning routines, cognitive processes, problem…”
The effects of integrating mobile devices with teaching and learning on students' learning performance: A meta-analysis and research synthesis (2016, background): “As Slavin (2012) proposed, whether higher social cohesion is related with higher learning achievement is not conclusive.”
Advancing the Science of Collaborative Problem Solving (2018, background): “Research on groups in educational settings There is a rich literature on group learning in educational settings (Slavin, 2017), but unfortunately very little of this research has focused on CPS per se.”
The Effects of Jigsaw Learning on Students' Attitudes in a Vietnamese Higher Education Classroom. (2012, background): “Such positive relationships result in an increase in motivation and persistence in working toward the shared goals, as well as more satisfaction, commitment to group goals, productivity and personal responsibility for achievement (Johnson & Johnson, 2006; Slavin, 2011).”
Cooperative Learning Strategies to Enhance Writing Skills among Second Language Learners (2019, methodology): “Yet, CL had proven to be one of the best methods in enhancing students’ performance in language learning, especially writing, as it promotes cooperation among students and reduced peer competition and isolation, and further promotes academic achievement and positive relationships (Slavin, 2011).”
Effective Programs in Elementary Mathematics: A Meta-Analysis (2021, methodology): “The theoretical base for tutoring draws on research in reading, which has long made extensive use of one-to-one and small group tutoring (see, e.g., Elbaum et al., 2000; Gersten et al., 2020; Slavin et al., 2011; Wanzek et al., 2016) as well as in mathematics (e.g., Fuchs, Schumacher, et al., 2013; ”
Conceptualizing Perseverance in Problem Solving as Collective Enterprise (2017, background): “…p. 279; 1978, pp. 89–90, emphasis added) The idea that students can be awakened to possibilities unlike what happens when working alone, reverberates through numerous studies of collaborative learning (e.g., De Guerrero & Villamil, 2000; Doolittle, 1997; Nyikos & Hashimoto, 1997; Slavin, 2011).”
A Synthesis of Quantitative Research on Programs for Struggling Readers in Elementary Schools (2021, background): “The theory behind the use of cooperative learning to improve the reading skills of struggling readers depends on two major factors (see Slavin, 2017).”