Telling and detecting lies in a high-stake situation: the case of a convicted murderer

By Aldert Vrij, Samantha Mann. 2001

236 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/36e4f0a13069963a552803ae7e464fab917a6d6d

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Artificial Intelligence

In Social Psychology

In Sociology and Political Science

Citations in the corpus

Nonverbal Dominance Versus Verbal Accuracy in Lie Detection (2008, background): “, & van Koppen, P. J. (2007). Paradoxes of proof and punishment: Psychological pitfalls in judicial decision-”
Moderators of nonverbal indicators of deception: A meta-analytic synthesis. (2007, background): “Vrij and Mann (2001) investigated the behavior of a real suspect while he was interviewed by the police in a murder case.”
The truth about lies: What works in detecting high‐stakes deception? (2010, background): “Vrij and Mann (2001b) studied a murderer's behaviour during his police interview prior to and during his confession.”
Interrogating to detect deception and truth : effects of strategic use of evidence (2005, background): “I will discuss these approaches separately, but it is important to note that all three approaches may be relevant simultaneously (Vrij & Mann, 2001a).”
To act truthfully: Nonverbal behaviour and strategies during a police interrogation (2006, background): “Vrij and Mann ( 2001b ) analysed his behaviour during the interviews, and compared the behaviour accompanying his truths and his lies.”
Credibility of the emotional witness: A study of ratings by police investigators (2008, background): “…police officers (incorrectly) list the same signs as lay people (DePaulo et al., 2003; Ekman, O’Sullivan, & Frank, 1999; Ekman & O’Sullivan, 1991; Vrij & Mann, 2001), and police officers do not outperform lay people when required to discriminate between truth and deceit (Ekman & O’Sullivan,…”
Child witness research and forensic interviews of young children: A review (2007, background): “Overall, experts, even in high stakes situations, score at chance levelwhen asked to identify liars from truth tellers (Bond & DePaulo, 2006; Ekman et al., 1999; Vrij & Mann, 2001; but see Edelstein, Luten, Ekman, & Goodman, 2006).”
How to Detect Deception? Arresting the Beliefs of Police Officers, Prosecutors and Judges (2003, methodology): “Importantly, both experimentally based research (Granhag and Strömwall, in press b; Vrij, 1995), and studies of real-life interrogations (Mann et al, 2000; Vrij and Mann, 2001) shows that liars often move less than truth-tellers.”
Why professionals fail to catch liars and how they can improve (2004, unknown): “In our own studies (Mann et al., 2004; Vrij & Mann, 2001) we found that participants (police officers in both studies) who mentioned gaze aversion and fidgeting as cues to deceit achieved the lowest accuracy scores.”