Applied Business research: Qualitative and Quantitative Methods
By R. Cavana, B. Delahaye, U. Sekaran. 2001
1,994 citations recorded by the source corpus.
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/36bc4fbe76e9c31785c5ee71ab046288446253e6
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- Kaveh Asiaei
- J. Pinkse
- Ruzita Jusoh
- F. Fortanier
- Ans Kolk
- Nick Bontis
- Erfan Severi
- Dieter Fink
Citations in the corpus
- Harmonization in CSR Reporting (2011, background): “The scores for Community and Climate Change are relatively weak (although scores of 0.6 and higher are accepted in more exploratory studies; Cavana et al. 2001), But especially the Economic impact construct scored very low (alpha = 0.40), and while excluding one to two items did increase…”
- Intellectual capital and performance measurement systems in Iran (2018, methodology): “As suggested by Cavana et al. (2001), the authors performed a pre-testing process in three steps.”
- The relationship between innovation, knowledge, and performance in family and non-family firms: an analysis of SMEs (2013, background): “The personal delivery method is acknowledged to increase response rates as completed responses can help (a) establish rapport with respondents while introducing the survey, (b) provide clarifications if needed quickly, and (c) collect the questionnaire immediately (Cavana et al. 2001).”
- The Impacts of Electronic Word of Mouth on Brand Equity in the Context of Social Media (2014, methodology): “Results in this study was analysed by using cross sectional data in which the cross section a data is solely capable to disclose the net impact of independent variable regardings to a certain dependent variable at a particular time frame (Cavana et al., 2001).”
- Organic food products in China: determinants of consumers’ purchase intentions (2012, methodology): “In order to confirm how well the results obtained from the use of measures fits the theories around which the study was designed, discriminant validity testing was conducted based on the measurement models (Cavana, Delahaye, and Sekaran 2001).”
- Tourism Distribution Channels: The Visitors’ Perspective (2005, methodology): “…are tested using chi-square, and, when the data did not meet the assumptions of this test (notably, there were more than 20% of the cells of the table with expected frequencies less than 5), the significance level for the likelihood ratio (LR) is reported (Cavana, Delahay, and Sekaran 2001).”
- The Determinants of Consumers' Attitude towards Advertising/LES DÉTERMINANTS DE L'ATTITUDE DES CONSOMMATEURS ENVERS LA PUBLICITÉ (2010, methodology): “Construct validity was adopted in this research as validity measurement and factor analysis was used to measure this (Cavana et al., 2001).”