Resources, capabilities, risk capital and the creation of university spin-out companies

By Andy Lockett, Mike Wright. 2005

905 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Accounting, Economics and Econometrics, Management of Technology and Innovation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/347d6130183d976945daf08a456e2aac91253828

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Accounting

In Economics and Econometrics

In Management of Technology and Innovation

Citations in the corpus

Determinants and consequences of university spinoff activity: a conceptual framework (2008, background): “A study by Lockett and Wright (2005) provides similar findings for the UK.”
The strategic orientation of universities in knowledge transfer activities (2019, background): “Additionally, they manage to develop contacts outside of academia in all of these areas, thereby increasing the probability of success of new ventures, which require a heterogeneous background within the entrepreneurial team (Clarysse and Moray, 2004; Kochenkova et al., 2016; Lockett and Wright, 200”
Startups by recent university graduates and their faculty: implications for university entrepreneurship policy (2012, neutral): “, 1998), the age of the TLO and TLO staff bonuses (e.g. Belenzon and Schankerman, 2009; Lockett and Wright, 2005; Markman et al., 2009), as well as university culture and norms (Bercovitz and Feldman, 2008; Louis et al.”
Effects of university characteristics on scientists’ interactions with the private sector: an exploratory assessment (2008, background): “They also found that universities’ rate of startup formation is positively associated with the university expenditures on intellectual property protection, the business development capabilities of the technology transfer office, and the extent to which its royalty distribution formula favors faculty”
R&D intensity and commercialization orientation effects on financial performance (2006, methodology): “In this study, we adopt define commercialization the process of bringing science and technology capabilities or R&D results into the marketplace (Lockett and Wright, 2005).”
Institutional determinants of university spin-off quantity and quality: a longitudinal, multilevel, cross-country study (2016, methodology): “Following previous work (e.g., Lockett and Wright 2005), we operationalize quality as a count of the number of university spin-offs from a given university in a given year, which have received the first round of VC financing in that year.”
Academics’ start-up intentions and knowledge filters: an individual perspective of the knowledge spillover theory of entrepreneurship (2013, background): “These support measures attempt to reduce the conflict that may exist between the roles of an academic and an entrepreneur (Lockett and Wright 2005), while also allowing academic entrepreneurs to create links with external agents and”
Strategic Entrepreneurship at Universities: Academic Entrepreneurs’ Assessment of Policy Programs (2009, background): “For example, Lockett and Wright (2005) showed that the formation of university spin-offs is higher the more resources, in terms of technology to commercialize, intellectual property advice, and business development capabilities, TTOs provide to academic entrepreneurs, but they do not consider…”
University entrepreneurship: a taxonomy of the literature (2007, background): “…to the quality of human resources, (i.e., faculty, founding team, and TTO personnel), technology endowment, and funding from university, industry, and venture capitalists (Shane and Stuart, 2002; Link and Scott, 2005a; Lockett and Wright, 2005; O’Shea et al., 2005; Powers and McDougall, 2005b).”