Beliefs, attitude and behaviour towards fresh meat revisited after the Belgian dioxin crisis

201 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

European food scares and their impact on EU food policy (2007, background): “Analyses revealed dioxin levels exceeded the legal standards by as much as 1,500 times for chicken fat (Verbeke, 2001).”
Food quality and safety: consumer perception and demand (2005, background): “First, in situations where major safety problems are perceived—the so-called food scares, such as BSE (Burton and Young, 1996), the dioxin problem in Belgium (Verbeke, 2001), or the Alar controversy in the USA (Herrmann et al.”
Personal determinants of organic food consumption: a review (2009, background): “, Verbeke, W., Mondelaers, K., Van Huylenbroeck, G. (2009). Personal”
Risk perception and consumer willingness to pay for certified beef in Spain (2007, background): “Verbeke (2001) reported that after the BSE crisis,”
Consumer trust in the food value chain and its impact on consumer confidence: A model for assessing consumer trust and evidence from a 5-country study in Europe (2020, background): “Food safety has received much attention in the literature on consumer trust in food chain actors, from bovine spongiform encephalopathy (BSE), more commonly known as mad cow disease (Smith et al., 1998) in 1996, and the 1999 dioxin crisis in Belgium (Verbeke, 2001), to the 2013 horsemeat scandal (Ma”