The Globalization of Competition and the Localization of Competitive Advantage: Policies towards Regional Clustering

246 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

CLUSTER formation, institutions and learning: the emergence of clusters and development in Chile (2005, background): “From this perspective, the ability of firms to compete in wider national and international markets is possible because they draw major benefits from their location and participation in a regional cluster (Porter, 1990, 2000; Enright, 1999, 2000; Scott, 1999).”
Regional Clustering in Australia (2001, background): “The fact that even such ‘placeless’ activities have shown tendencies to cluster indicates the strength of the phenomenon (Enright 2000).”
Regions, globalization, and the knowledge-based economy (2002, background): “In a recent paper, Enright (2000) gives several examples of foreign firms being drawn into spatial clusters by the presence of knowledge-enhancing facilities.”
Regional Clusters: What We Know and What We Should Know (2003, unknown): “4 Enright (2000a) 5 Enright (1996) and UNCTAD (1998) 6 Enright (1991.”
The Cluster Policies Whitebook (2004, background): “Clusters generally engage actors and resources located in multiple countries (Enright, 1999).”