The convergent validity of two burnout instruments: A multitrait-multimethod analysis.
By Evangelia Demerouti, Arnold B. Bakker, I. Vardakou, A. Kantas. 2003
1,120 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: General Health Professions, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Social Psychology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/34505fd5010d2187d80be99f3abfea372e264d0d
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In General Health Professions
- Arnold B. Bakker
- Wilmar B. Schaufeli
- Evangelia Demerouti
- Osman M. Karatepe
- Tareq Lubbadeh
- S. Rothmann
- J. Hakanen
- Hans De Witte
In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
- Arnold B. Bakker
- Wilmar B. Schaufeli
- Evangelia Demerouti
- Osman M. Karatepe
- M. Tims
- J. Hakanen
- Daantje Derks
- Tareq Lubbadeh
In Social Psychology
- Arnold B. Bakker
- Wilmar B. Schaufeli
- Evangelia Demerouti
- Osman M. Karatepe
- J. Hakanen
- S. Rothmann
- Tareq Lubbadeh
- M. Tims
Citations in the corpus
- Measuring job and academic burnout with the Oldenburg Burnout Inventory (OLBI): Factorial invariance across samples and countries (2015, background): “Third, we test the ecological validity of the OLBI-S by investigating its invariance across German and Greek students and look for latent mean differences between these two samples.”
- The construct validity of an alternative measure of burnout: Investigating the English translation of the Oldenburg Burnout Inventory (2005, methodology): “Moreover, it would be important to examine the relationships between the OLBI, MBI and other constructs to examine differences in the relationships with outside constructs (e.g. satisfaction, commitment, performance).”
- Do job resources moderate the effect of emotional dissonance on burnout (2011, methodology): “Consistent with the OLBI (Demerouti et al., 2001; Demerouti et al., 2003), responses to the items in exhaustion and disengagement were recorded on four-point scales ranging from ð4 1⁄4 strongly agree) to ð1 1⁄4 strongly disagree).”
- Burnout and Work Engagement: The JD–R Approach (2014, positive): “Other scholars have developed alternative measures to assess burnout, most notably the Oldenburg Burnout Inventory (OLBI; Demerouti et al. 2003, Demerouti et al. 2010) and the Shirom-Melamed Burnout Measure (SMBM; Shirom & Melamed 2006).”
- Job Demands–Resources Theory: Taking Stock and Looking Forward (2017, background): “By the turn of the century, burnout had become a serious issue in most Western countries, and scholars started to realize that the syndrome was not unique to those performing “people work” (Bakker, Demerouti, & Schaufeli, 2002; Demerouti, Bakker, Vardakou, & Kantas, 2003; Leiter & Schaufeli, 1996).”
- Burnout and engagement: A South African perspective (2003, methodology): “Recent research showed that the psychometric value of the MBI-GS could be greatly enhanced by including positively phrased items of the Disengagement Scale of the Oldenburg Burnout Inventory (OLBI) (Demerouti, Bakker, Vardakou & Kantas, 2003).”
- Effects of support on stress and burnout in school principals (2016, methodology): “Another conceptualisation of burnout was developed and validated by Demerouti et al. (2001, 2003).”
- Fostering task and adaptive performance through employee well-being: The role of servant leadership (2020, methodology): “Burnout was measured by six items from the Oldenburg Burnout Inventory (Demerouti et al., 2003) tapping into exhaustion and disengagement.”