The Wealth of Knowledge: Intellectual Capital and the Twenty-first Century Organization

By T. A. Stewart. 2001

324 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Intellectual capital performance in the banking sector: An assessment of Australian owned banks (2010, background): “The importance of IC in the contemporary context can be understood when researchers have claimed that organizations that employ knowledge mainly depend on the performance of their IC ( Stewart, 2001”
Knowledge management and the dynamic nature of knowledge (2002, background): “Although technology developments may have made many aspects of knowledge sharing possible (Dutta, 1998; Stewart, 2001), it is a mistake to equate knowledge management with a technology tool.”
Intellectual capital and financial performance: an evaluation of the Australian financial sector (2013, background): “Many have argued that as the knowledge economy grows and, possibly, becomes the dominant form of commerce, then companies will largely depend on the performance of their IC for value maintenance and growth (Sveiby, 1997; Stewart, 2001; Wood, 2003; Cabrita and Vaz, 2005).”
On the metaphorical nature of intellectual capital: a textual analysis (2005, background): “Stewart (2001) claims that it dates back at least to 1958 with Marr (2005) suggesting that it goes even further back to 1836 when the economist Nassau William Snr.”
Why do firms measure their intellectual capital (2003, unknown): “443 strategic importance (Grant, 1991; Stewart, 2001; Andriessen and Tissen, 2000; Teece, 2000a).”