Why do firms measure their intellectual capital
By Bernard Marr, D. Gray, Andy Neely. 2003
474 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Finance, Strategy and Management
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/58db304b878543741db5621571f6f5e2daff37dc
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Finance
- Jan Mouritsen
- Suresh Cuganesan
- Petros Vourvachis
- T. Woodward
- Nick Bontis
- Bernard Marr
- R. Whiting
- Tamer Shahwan
In Strategy and Management
Citations in the corpus
- Intellectual capital and business performance in the Portuguese banking industry (2008, background): “However, some academics simply claim that more rigorous empirical testing is needed ( Marr, Gray and Neely, 2003 ).”
- Intellectual capital reporting at UK universities (2010, background): “Overall the benefits of externally disclosing information on IC are not clear at this point, thus so far the disclosure is mainly voluntary ( Marr et al. , 2003”
- Intellectual capital disclosure payback (2011, background): “have highlighted the existing market benefits of reporting IC (Edvinsson, 1997; van der Meer-Kooistra and Zijlstra, 2001; Meritum Project, 2002; Kremp and Mairesse, 2002; Mouritsen, 2002; Peña, 2002; Marr, 2003; Mouritsen and Bukh, 2003; Systematic, 2004; Abdolmohammadi, 2005; Sonnier et al., 2007; ”
- Defining intellectual capital: a three‐dimensional approach (2005, background): “A second necessary condition is to clarify the roles IC plays, which could be classified into three main categories (see for example Marr and Gray (2003)”
- The Impact of Intellectual Capital on Firm Performance: A Modified and Extended VAIC Model (2020, background): “Based on resource-based theory, the resources possessed by any organization are unique and inimitable (Marr et al., 2003).”
- Intellectual capital at the crossroads: managing, measuring, and reporting of IC (2004, background): “A systematic review of the literature allowed researchers to identify three main categories of reasons why firms measure their IC (Marr et al., 2003).”
- Intellectual capital and firm performance in Australia (2011, background): “Marr et al. (2003) argue that a firm’s value is often partly based on the intangible intellectual capital (IC) that it possesses.”
- Intellectual Capital : Definitions, Categorization and Reporting Models (2008, background): “Organizational or structural capital is the most complex – and has undergone several changes, but recently, some researchers (Marr et al., 2003) have suggested it to include culture, innovation and process.”
- Intellectual capital‐in‐action and value creation: A case study of knowledge transformations in an innovation project (2005, background): “Introduction Within the discipline of intellectual capital (IC), conceptual refinement, methodology consolidation and empirical research are seen as important elements of scholarly development (Petty and Guthrie, 2000; Marr et al., 2003; Andriessen, 2004).”
- Problematising intellectual capital research: ostensive versus performative IC (2006, methodology): “This is also the case in Marr et al.’s (2004) interesting visualisation of the dynamics of value creation through mapping techniques.”