Up-regulation of miR-200 and let-7 by natural agents leads to the reversal of epithelial-mesenchymal transition in gemcitabine-resistant pancreatic cancer cells

By Yiwei Li, T. Vandenboom, D. Kong, Zhiwei Wang, Shadan Ali, P. Philip, Fazlul H. Sarkar. Cancer Research, 2009

665 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Pancreatic cancer (PC) is the fourth most common cause of cancer death in the United States and the aggressiveness of PC is in part due to its intrinsic and extrinsic drug resistance characteristics, which is also associated with the acquisition of epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT). Emerging evidence also suggest that the processes of EMT is regulated by the expression status of many microRNAs (miRNAs), which are believed to function as key regulators of various biological and pathological processes during tumor development and progression. In the present study, we compared the expression of miRNAs between gemcitabine-sensitive and gemcitabine-resistant PC cells, and investigated whether the treatment of cells with “natural agents” [3,3′-diinodolylmethane (DIM) or isoflavone] could affect the expression of miRNAs. We found that the expression of miR-200b, miR-200c, let-7b, let-7c, let-7d, and let-7e was significantly down-regulated in gemcitabine-resistant cells that showed EMT characteristics such as elongated fibroblastoid morphology, lower expression of epithelial marker E-cadherin, and higher expression of mesenchymal markers such as vimentin and ZEB1. Moreover, we found that re-expression of miR-200 by transfection studies or treatment of gemcitabine-resistant cells with either DIM or isoflavone resulted in the down-regulation of ZEB1, slug, and vimentin, which was consistent with morphological reversal of EMT phenotype leading to epithelial morphology. These results provide experimental evidence, for the first time, that DIM and isoflavone could function as miRNA regulators leading to the reversal of EMT phenotype, which is likely to be important for designing novel therapies for PC.

Subfields: Cancer Research, Molecular Biology, Oncology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/3438a874f46ba4d44a525ff194e1e81a198353aa

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cancer Research

  1. A. Kasinski
  2. Thomas Brabletz
  3. Simone Brabletz
  4. Frank J. Slack
  5. George A. Calin
  6. M. Nieto
  7. Carlo Maria Croce

In Molecular Biology

  1. A. Kasinski
  2. Thomas Brabletz
  3. Simone Brabletz
  4. Anurag Singh
  5. Vishal Das
  6. Channakeshavaiah Chikkaputtaiah
  7. Frank J. Slack
  8. Mintu Pal

In Oncology

  1. Thomas Brabletz
  2. Simone Brabletz
  3. Anurag Singh
  4. J. Settleman
  5. R. Weinberg
  6. D. Hanahan
  7. M. Nieto

Citations in the corpus