Interpreting Empirical Results in Strategy and Management Research

54 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Internationalization strategy, firm resources and the survival of SMEs in the export market (2014, methodology): “A key assumption of the CPHM is the concept of proportional hazards, that is, the covariates are multiplicatively related to the hazard.”
The Differential Impact of Knowledge Depth and Knowledge Breadth on Creativity over Individual Careers (2017, methodology): “We performed a split sample analysis to further explore our moderation hypotheses, (Shaver, 2007).”
Finding a Home away from Home (2014, methodology): “In the primary analysis, I split the sample at meaningful levels of the moderating variables and assessed the statistical significance of differences by conducting a t-test comparison of the marginal effects across subsamples (Hoetker, 2007; Shaver, 2007).”
Apprentice, Departure, and Demotion: An Examination of the Three Types of CEO–Board Chair Separation (2013, methodology): “Because research has shown interactions in nonlinear models to sometimes be deceptive (Ai & Norton, 2003; Wiersema & Bowen, 2009), we also conducted the analyses at above-mean and belowmean levels of firm performance (Shaver, 2007).”