Internet-based Personality Testing: Equivalence of Measures and Assesses' Perceptions and Reactions

By Jesús Salgado, Silvia Moscoso. 2003

103 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Gender Studies, Information Systems and Management, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/32cd501a202438aea06240714bde394b0f61586b

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Gender Studies

1. Daniel Nettle
2. Neal Schmitt
3. R. Goffin

In Information Systems and Management

1. Daniel Nettle
2. Neal Schmitt

In Sociology and Political Science

1. Daniel Nettle
2. Neal Schmitt
3. R. Goffin
4. Mitchell G. Rothstein
5. Mark Schaller

Citations in the corpus

• Psychological profiles of professional actors. (2006, background): “Moreover, pencil and paper and internet administrations of the same questionnaires produce very similar norms and factor structures (Gosling, Vazire, Srivastava, & John, 2004; Salgado & Moscoso, 2003 ).”
• The use of personality measures in personnel selection: What does current research support? (2006, background): “Consequently, three studies were of particular relevance to our review (Bartram & Brown, 2004; Ployhart et al., 2003; Salgado & Moscoso, 2003).”
• Personality and Cognitive Ability as Predictors of Effective Performance at Work (2014, background): “Two investigations (Bartram & Brown 2004, Salgado & Moscoso 2003) found that biodata and personality measures displayed similar internal consistency and intercorrelations when measured by computer and paper.”