COSMOLOGICAL CONSTRAINTS FROM THE SLOAN DIGITAL SKY SURVEY MaxBCG CLUSTER CATALOG
By E. Rozo, Risa Wechsler, Eli S. Rykoff, James Annis, Matthew R. Becker, August E. Evrard, Joshua A. Frieman, S. Hansen, Jiangang Hao, D. Johnston and 4 more. 2009
366 citations recorded by the source corpus.
We use the abundance and weak-lensing mass measurements of the Sloan Digital Sky Survey maxBCG cluster catalog to simultaneously constrain cosmology and the richness–mass relation of the clusters. Assuming a flat ΛCDM cosmology, we find σ8(Ωm/0.25)0.41 = 0.832 ± 0.033 after marginalization over all systematics. In common with previous studies, our error budget is dominated by systematic uncertainties, the primary two being the absolute mass scale of the weak-lensing masses of the maxBCG clusters, and uncertainty in the scatter of the richness–mass relation. Our constraints are fully consistent with the WMAP five-year data, and in a joint analysis we find σ8 = 0.807 ± 0.020 and Ωm = 0.265 ± 0.016, an improvement of nearly a factor of 2 relative to WMAP5 alone. Our results are also in excellent agreement with and comparable in precision to the latest cosmological constraints from X-ray cluster abundances. The remarkable consistency among these results demonstrates that cluster abundance constraints are not only tight but also robust, and highlight the power of optically selected cluster samples to produce precision constraints on cosmological parameters.
Subfields: Astronomy and Astrophysics, Nuclear and High Energy Physics
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/322a0cc2a7d00cb8f3834d0b2d74f450ef045272
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Astronomy and Astrophysics
- Andrey V. Kravtsov
- Volker Springel
- Simon D. M. White
- L. Hernquist
- P. Hopkins
- F. V. D. Bosch
- D. Schneider
- Risa Wechsler
In Nuclear and High Energy Physics
- Andrey V. Kravtsov
- F. V. D. Bosch
- Volker Springel
- Simon D. M. White
- Carlos S. Frenk
- Joop Schaye
- M. White
- E. Komatsu
Citations in the corpus
- Galaxy formation theory (2010, background): “…2005; Tegmark et al. 2006; Percival et al. 2007a,b), the Type Ia supernovae magnitude–redshift relation (Kowalski et al. 2008) and galaxy clusters (Mantz et al., 2009; Vikhlinin et al., 2009; Rozo et al., 2010), have now placed strong constraints on theparameters of the cold dark matter cosmogony.”
- Cosmological Constraints from a Combination of Galaxy Clustering and Lensing -- III. Application to SDSS Data (2012, background): “…of the primordial deuterium abundance (e.g., Burles, Nollett & Turner 2001; O’Meara et al. 2006), cluster abundances (e.g., Vikhlinin et al. 2009; Rozo et al. 2010; Benson et al. 2011), cosmic shear (e.g., Benjamin et al. 2007; Fu et al. 2008; Lin et al. 2011), the integrated Sachs-Wolfe…”
- redMaPPer. I. ALGORITHM AND SDSS DR8 CATALOG (2013, background): “However, relatively few of these optical catalogs have been utilized for cosmological parameter constraints (e.g., Rozo et al. 2007, 2010; Mana et al. 2013).”
- GALAXY CLUSTERS DISCOVERED VIA THE SUNYAEV–ZEL’DOVICH EFFECT IN THE FIRST 720 SQUARE DEGREES OF THE SOUTH POLE TELESCOPE SURVEY (2012, methodology): “ΛCDM constraints In a ΛCDM model, cluster samples primarily constrain σ8 and Ωm (see e.g., B11, Rozo et al. 2010).”
- The Observed Growth of Massive Galaxy Clusters I: Statistical Methods and Cosmological Constraints (2009, methodology): “We also find good agreement with recent, independent analyses of X-ray selected galaxy clusters (Henry et al. 2009; Vikhlinin et al. 2009b) and optically selected clusters (Rozo et al. 2010).”
- Wide-Field InfrarRed Survey Telescope-Astrophysics Focused Telescope Assets WFIRST-AFTA 2015 Report (2015, methodology): “The strategy of stacked weak lensing mass calibration of clusters for cosmological constraints has been successfully implemented by Rozo et al. (2010) for optically selected clusters and Mantz et al. (2014) for Xray selected clusters, yielding some of the tightest current constraints on the…”
- The Atacama Cosmology Telescope: Sunyaev-Zel'dovich selected galaxy clusters at 148 GHz from three seasons of data (2013, neutral): “Recent results have demonstrated the power of modern optical and X-ray surveys for constraining cosmology (e.g., Vikhlinin et al. 2009b; Mantz et al. 2010b; Rozo et al. 2010).”
- COSMOLOGICAL CONSTRAINTS FROM SUNYAEV–ZEL'DOVICH-SELECTED CLUSTERS WITH X-RAY OBSERVATIONS IN THE FIRST 178 deg2 OF THE SOUTH POLE TELESCOPE SURVEY (2011, methodology): “Recently, Rozo et al. (2010) compared the cluster constraints from several different methods, and found generally good agreement and comparable constraints.”
- ROBUST OPTICAL RICHNESS ESTIMATION WITH REDUCED SCATTER (2011, methodology): “These surveys will be used to optically select galaxy clusters, and in conjunction with stacked weak-lensing mass calibration, can be used to place tight constraints on cosmological parameters (e.g., Rozo et al. 2010a, 2011b; Oguri & Takada 2011).”
- THE BLANCO COSMOLOGY SURVEY: DATA ACQUISITION, PROCESSING, CALIBRATION, QUALITY DIAGNOSTICS, AND DATA RELEASE (2012, methodology): “First cosmological constraints using SDSS optical catalogs are described in Rozo et al. (2010).”
- A SUNYAEV–ZEL'DOVICH-SELECTED SAMPLE OF THE MOST MASSIVE GALAXY CLUSTERS IN THE 2500 deg2 SOUTH POLE TELESCOPE SURVEY (2011, background): “…al. 2004; Wang et al. 2004; Lima & Hu 2007), and this constraining power has now been demonstrated with real cluster samples identified in optical (e.g., Rozo et al. 2010), X-ray (e.g., Vikhlinin et al. 2009b), and, most recently, millimeter (mm) (Vanderlinde et al. 2010; Sehgal et al. 2010b) data.”
- SEVEN-YEAR WILKINSON MICROWAVE ANISOTROPY PROBE (WMAP) OBSERVATIONS: COSMOLOGICAL INTERPRETATION (2010, background): “Reid et al. (2010b) added the maxBCG prior, σ8(Ωm/0.25) 0.41 = 0.832 ± 0.033 (68% CL; Rozo et al. 2010), to the 5-year WMAP+BAO+SN+HST, and found Neff = 3.5 ± 0.9 (68% CL).”
- Weighing the Giants - I. Weak-lensing masses for 51 massive galaxy clusters: project overview, data analysis methods and cluster images (2012, background): “This uncertainty in the absolute mass scaling is currently the dominant systematic uncertainty in the constraints on σ8 from cluster counts (Mantz et al. 2010a; Vikhlinin et al. 2009b; Rozo et al. 2010; Sehgal et al. 2011; Benson et al. 2013).”
- Cosmology and astrophysics from relaxed galaxy clusters - II. Cosmological constraints (2014, neutral): “…data (e.g. Percival et al. 2007, 2010; Spergel et al. 2007; Kowalski et al. 2008; Mantz et al. 2008, 2010b; Dunkley et al. 2009; Vikhlinin et al. 2009; Rozo et al. 2010; Blake et al. 2011; Komatsu et al. 2011; Hinshaw et al. 2013; Suzuki et al. 2012; Anderson et al. 2014; Benson et al. 2013;…”
- THE ATACAMA COSMOLOGY TELESCOPE: COSMOLOGY FROM GALAXY CLUSTERS DETECTED VIA THE SUNYAEV–ZEL'DOVICH EFFECT (2010, result): “We also find consistency with optical samples yielding σ8(Ωm/0.25)0.41 = 0.832±0.033 for a flat ΛCDM model (Rozo et al. 2010).”
- COSMOLOGICAL CONSTRAINTS FROM GALAXY CLUSTERS IN THE 2500 SQUARE-DEGREE SPT-SZ SURVEY (2016, background): “In addition, our cosmological constraints are consistent with other previous cluster surveys, including constraints from the X-ray selected sample from Vikhlinin et al. (2009b) and the optically selected sample from Rozo et al. (2010).”
- Formation of Galaxy Clusters (2012, methodology): “…counts measured at high redshifts provide interesting constraints on cosmological parameters complementary to other methods (e.g., Mantz et al. 2010b, Rozo et al. 2010, Vikhlinin et al. 2009c) and a crucial test of the entire class ofΛCDM and quintessence models (e.g., Benson et al. 2011; Jee etal.”
- The Atacama Cosmology Telescope: cosmological parameters from three seasons of data (2013, neutral): “…(e.g., Hicken et al. 2009; Kessler et al. 2009; Conley et al. 2011), galaxy cluster measurements (e.g., Vikhlinin et al. 2009; Mantz et al. 2010; Rozo et al. 2010; Tinker et al. 2012) and observations of gravitational lensing (e.g., Massey et al. 2007; Fu et al. 2008; Schrabback et al. 2010;…”
- Robust weak-lensing mass calibration of Planck galaxy clusters (2014, background): “…in the absolute calibration of cluster masses is currently the most significant challenge facing cluster cosmology (WtG; see also Vikhlinin et al. 2009; Mantz et al. 2010a; Rozo et al. 2010; Sehgal et al. 2011; Benson et al. 2013; Allen et al. 2011; LSST Dark Energy Science Collaboration 2012).”