Wide-Field InfrarRed Survey Telescope-Astrophysics Focused Telescope Assets WFIRST-AFTA 2015 Report
By David N. Spergel, N. Gehrels, C. Baltay, D. Bennett, J. Breckinridge, M. Donahue, A. Dressler, B. Gaudi, T. Greene, Olivier Guyon and 45 more. 2015
936 citations recorded by the source corpus.
This report describes the 2014 study by the Science Definition Team (SDT) of the Wide-Field Infrared Survey Telescope (WFIRST) mission. It is a space observatory that will address the most compelling scientific problems in dark energy, exoplanets and general astrophysics using a 2.4-m telescope with a wide-field infrared instrument and an optical coronagraph. The Astro2010 Decadal Survey recommended a Wide Field Infrared Survey Telescope as its top priority for a new large space mission. As conceived by the decadal survey, WFIRST would carry out a dark energy science program, a microlensing program to determine the demographics of exoplanets, and a general observing program utilizing its ultra wide field. In October 2012, NASA chartered a Science Definition Team (SDT) to produce, in collaboration with the WFIRST Study Office at GSFC and the Program Office at JPL, a Design Reference Mission (DRM) for an implementation of WFIRST using one of the 2.4-m, Hubble-quality telescope assemblies recently made available to NASA. This DRM builds on the work of the earlier WFIRST SDT, reported by Green et al. (2012) and the previous WFIRST-2.4 DRM, reported by Spergel et. (2013). The 2.4-m primary mirror enables a mission with greater sensitivity and higher angular resolution than the 1.3-m and 1.1-m designs considered previously, increasing both the science return of the primary surveys and the capabilities of WFIRST as a Guest Observer facility. The addition of an on-axis coronagraphic instrument to the baseline design enables imaging and spectroscopic studies of planets around nearby stars.
Subfields: Astronomy and Astrophysics, Instrumentation
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/eb8f135ff3b9861728498c86fa4921083388ca63
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Astronomy and Astrophysics
- D. Schneider
- L. Hernquist
- Daniel J. Eisenstein
- P. Hopkins
- Will J. Percival
- Simon D. M. White
- Rachel Mandelbaum
- C. Conroy
In Instrumentation
- D. Schneider
- P. Hopkins
- Daniel J. Eisenstein
- Rachel Mandelbaum
- L. Hernquist
- Will J. Percival
- C. Conroy
- M. White
Citations in the corpus
- The fourth data release of the Kilo-Degree Survey: ugri imaging and nine-band optical-IR photometry over 1000 square degrees (2019, background): “Since ground-based surveys are limited fundamentally by the atmospheric disturbance on galaxy shapes and photometry, space missions Euclid (Laureijs et al. 2011) and later WFIRST (Spergel et al. 2015) are planned to increase the fidelity of such studies further.”
- Unveiling the gravitational universe at μ-Hz frequencies (2019, background): “Thirty-meter class optical telescopes, such as the Extremely Large Telescope (ELT, [117]) and Thirty Meter Telescope (TMT, [213]), will reveal the assembly of the first galaxies out to z > 10; the next generation of X-ray missions, like the ESA L2 Advanced Telescope for High Energy Astrophysics (Ath”
- Pale Orange Dots: The Impact of Organic Haze on the Habitability and Detectability of Earthlike Exoplanets (2016, background): “…Exoplanet Survey Satellite (TESS) will search for these nearby worlds, and a handful of them may be observable with upcoming space-based missions such as the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST) and the WideField Infrared Survey Telescope (WFIRST) (Beichman et al. 2014; Spergel et al. 2015).”
- Status of Neutrino Properties and Future Prospects—Cosmological and Astrophysical Constraints (2017, background): “On the other hand, the new generation of large scale structure surveys – including the Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument [36], the Large Synoptic Survey Telescope [37], Euclid [38] and the Wide Frequency InfraRed Spectroscopic Telescope [39] – will also probe the late-time universe with the ultim”
- Fast and Scalable Gaussian Process Modeling with Applications to Astronomical Time Series (2017, background): “…that the application of GPs will be expanded to the existing and forthcoming large astronomical time domain surveys such as Kepler(Borucki et al. 2010), K2 (Howell et al. 2014), TESS (Ricker et al. 2014), LSST (Ivezić et al. 2008), WFIRST (Spergel et al. 2015), and PLATO (Rauer et al. 2014).”
- The SPTpol Extended Cluster Survey (2019, background): “This work will complement the wide-area cluster surveys to be conducted at X-ray (eROSITA; Predehl et al. 2010; Merloni et al. 2012) and optical/IR wavelengths (e.g., LSST, LSST Science Collaboration et al. 2009; Euclid, Euclid Collaboration et al. 2019; WFIRST, Spergel et al. 2015), as well as SZ s”
- Dark energy, α-attractors, and large-scale structure surveys (2017, methodology): “These include several ground based experiments such as the Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument (DESI) [81, 82], the Large Synoptic Survey Telescope (LSST) [83, 84], and the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) [85–90], as well as the space based experiments Euclid [91, 92] and the Wide Field InfraRed Surve”
- Predictions of the WFIRST Microlensing Survey. I. Bound Planet Detection Rates (2018, methodology): “…of planets WFIRST will de- tect we integrated the resulting numbers using the trapezoidal rule; for the Cycle 7 design this results in an expected total yield of ∼1400 planets, noting that it does not include freefloating planets which would add a few hundred to this figure (Spergel et al. 2015).”
- KiDS-1000 cosmology: Cosmic shear constraints and comparison between two point statistics (2020, background): “2 Legacy Survey of Space and Time; https://www.lsst.org Article published by EDP Sciences A104, page 1 of 31 NASA’s Nancy Grace Roman Space Telescope3 (Spergel et al. 2015).”
- SDSS-III Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey Data Release 12: galaxy target selection and large-scale structure catalogues (2015, background): “The best-fitting line shows the growth in the impact of past surveys, following the development of multi-object spectrographs (MOS) on the Anglo-Australian telescope (Lewis, Glazebrook & Taylor 1998) and the Sloan telescope (Gunn et al. 2006), which continues to the next generation with a new MOS be”