THE BLANCO COSMOLOGY SURVEY: DATA ACQUISITION, PROCESSING, CALIBRATION, QUALITY DIAGNOSTICS, AND DATA RELEASE

By S. Desai, R. Armstrong, J. J. Mohr, D. R. Semler, J. Liu, E. Bertin, S. Allam, W. Barkhouse, G. Bazin, Elizabeth Buckley-Geer and 10 more. 2012

187 citations recorded by the source corpus.

The Blanco Cosmology Survey (BCS) is a 60 night imaging survey of ∼80 deg2 of the southern sky located in two fields: (α, δ) = (5 hr, −55°) and (23 hr, −55°). The survey was carried out between 2005 and 2008 in griz bands with the Mosaic2 imager on the Blanco 4 m telescope. The primary aim of the BCS survey is to provide the data required to optically confirm and measure photometric redshifts for Sunyaev–Zel'dovich effect selected galaxy clusters from the South Pole Telescope and the Atacama Cosmology Telescope. We process and calibrate the BCS data, carrying out point-spread function-corrected model-fitting photometry for all detected objects. The median 10σ galaxy (point-source) depths over the survey in griz are approximately 23.3 (23.9), 23.4 (24.0), 23.0 (23.6), and 21.3 (22.1), respectively. The astrometric accuracy relative to the USNO-B survey is ∼45 mas. We calibrate our absolute photometry using the stellar locus in grizJ bands, and thus our absolute photometric scale derives from the Two Micron All Sky Survey, which has ∼2% accuracy. The scatter of stars about the stellar locus indicates a systematic floor in the relative stellar photometric scatter in griz that is ∼1.9%, ∼2.2%, ∼2.7%, and ∼2.7%, respectively. A simple cut in the AstrOmatic star–galaxy classifier spread_model produces a star sample with good spatial uniformity. We use the resulting photometric catalogs to calibrate photometric redshifts for the survey and demonstrate scatter δz/(1 + z) = 0.054 with an outlier fraction η < 5% to z ∼ 1. We highlight some selected science results to date and provide a full description of the released data products.

Subfields: Astronomy and Astrophysics, Instrumentation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c4041dc9bf6d34dcd17e6aa676f9b3a8137caa11

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Astronomy and Astrophysics

  1. Andrey V. Kravtsov
  2. Simon D. M. White
  3. D. Schneider
  4. Volker Springel
  5. L. Hernquist
  6. Risa Wechsler
  7. J. Brinkmann
  8. Daniel J. Eisenstein

In Instrumentation

  1. Andrey V. Kravtsov
  2. Risa Wechsler
  3. Simon D. M. White
  4. Rachel Mandelbaum
  5. L. Hernquist
  6. D. Schneider
  7. Erin Sheldon
  8. J. Brinkmann

Citations in the corpus