From Conditioning to Conscious Recollection Memory Systems of the Brain. Oxford Psychology Series, Volume 35.
By Neal J. Cohen. 2001
864 citations recorded by the source corpus.
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/318982230424906948205941ac3539813867a53f
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- Yoshua Bengio
- Sergey Levine
- Caiming Xiong
- Mohit Bansal
- Richard Socher
- Ruslan Salakhutdinov
- Zhe Gan
- Jianfeng Gao
Citations in the corpus
- Contributions of memory circuits to language: the declarative/procedural model. (2004, background): “The demonstration of numerous double dissociations has shown that the two systems are largely independent from each other, though they interact in a number of ways (Eichenbaum & Cohen, 2001; Mishkin et al., 1984; Poldrack & Packard, 2003; Schacter & Tulving, 1994; Squire & Knowlton, 2000).”
- Perirhinal cortex supports encoding and familiarity-based recognition of novel associations. (2008, background): “…the MTL propose that the PRc specifically encodes representations that support familiarity or item memory, whereas the hippocampus encodes representations that support recollection or relational memory (Aggleton and Brown, 1999; Davachi, 2006; Eichenbaum and Cohen, 2001; Eichenbaum et al., 2007).”
- Integrating Memories in the Human Brain: Hippocampal–Midbrain Encoding of Overlapping Events (2008, background): “, 1997) and theories of hippocampal contributions to declarative memory (Eichenbaum and Cohen, 2001; Greene et al., 2006; Kumaran and Maguire, 2006; O’Reilly and Rudy, 2001; Squire, 1992).”
- The medial temporal lobe and memory (2007, background): “In contrast to this declarative/nondeclarative perspective, relational memory theory proposes that MTL function is independent of conscious awareness, with MTL processes being essential for the binding of distinct elements of an event into a memory representation that captures the relationships betw”
- The Role of Feedback Contingency in Perceptual Category Learning (2016, unknown): “There is now abundant evidence that declarative and procedural memory both contribute to perceptual category learning (e.g., Ashby & Maddox, 2005, 2010; Eichenbaum & Cohen , 2001; Poldrack et al., 2001; Poldrack & Packard, 2003; Squire, 2004).”
- Hippocampal Amnesia Impairs All Manner of Relational Memory (2008, background): “It is proposed that the formation of new relational memories is dependent on the hippocampus specifi cally, whereas memory for single objects or items is proposed to be dependent on MTL cortical regions, such as perirhinal cortex (e.g., Eichenbaum and Cohen, 2001; Eichenbaum et al., 1994).”
- Generalization of value in reinforcement learning by humans (2012, background): “…episodic memory, associated with the hippocampus and operationally distinguished from a striatal habit system (Schacter, 1990; Squire, 1992; Knowlton et al., 1996; Gabrieli, 1998; Eichenbaum & Cohen, 2001; Poldrack et al., 2001; Hartley & Burgess, 2005; Foerde et al., 2006; Mattfeld & Stark, 2011).”
- Flexible Memories: Differential Roles for Medial Temporal Lobe and Prefrontal Cortex in Cross-Episode Binding (2010, background): “One hypothesized mechanism for cross-episode binding proposes that individual experiences are separately, but flexibly encoded, and then recalled and recombined at retrieval to support transfer (Eichenbaum and Cohen, 2001).”
- Functions of remembering and misremembering emotion (2009, unknown): “EXPLICIT AND IMPLICIT REPRESENTATIONS OF EMOTION Theory and research have distinguished between explicit and implicit memory systems (e.g. Eichenbaum & Cohen, 2003; Jacoby, 1991; Tulving.”
- The Declarative/Procedural Model (2020, background): “Each lobe contains many smaller structures known as gyri and sulci (singular: gyrus and sulcus).”
- The temporal context model in spatial navigation and relational learning: toward a common explanation of medial temporal lobe function across domains. (2005, background): “Recent decades have seen this unitary approach to memory fragment into the categorization of multiple types of memory, typically with separable neural substrates for each (e.g. Eichenbaum & Cohen, 2001; Nadel & Moscovitch, 1997; Tulving & Schacter, 1991).”
- Non-commercial Research and Educational Use including without Limitation Use in Instruction at Your Institution, Sending It to Specific Colleagues That You Know, and Providing a Copy to Your Institution's Administrator. All Other Uses, Reproduction and Distribution, including without Limitation Comm (2005, unknown): “Moreover, such studies have contributed greatly to a better understanding of intermolecular interactions between liquid-crystal solvent and solute.”
- The Future of Memory: Remembering, Imagining, and the Brain (2012, background): “…2002a, 2002b) but instead emphasizes processes involved in linking together distinct elements of an episode, in particular relational processing capacities that have been linked with hippocampal function (Eichenbaum and Cohen, 2001) and that may contribute to the construction of simulated events.”
- Hippocampal activation during transitive inference in humans (2004, background): “These two observations indicate that series of overlapping stimulus pairs are stored as a unified and flexible representation, which provides strong evidence for transitive inference as a general relational memory capacity (Eichenbaum and Cohen, 2001).”
- Remembering the past to imagine the future: the prospective brain (2007, unknown): “…links hippocampal function and relational processing with future event simulation: the hippocampal region is thought to support relational processes 39 , which are in turn suggested to be crucial for recombining stored information into future event simulations. one important issue that needs to be…”