How in-vehicle activities affect work commuters’ satisfaction with public transport

By Dick Ettema, M. Friman, Tommy Gärling, Lars E. Olsson, Satoshi Fujii. 2012

358 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Applied Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience, Transportation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/31675374e43bb752fbc87534364b48a77a070e2b

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Applied Psychology

In Cognitive Neuroscience

In Transportation

Citations in the corpus

How satisfying is the Scale for Travel Satisfaction (2015, methodology): “This paper argues that a STS with two underlying dimensions – emotions and cognitive evaluation – fits the Ghent data better than the three dimensional STS proposed by Ettema et al. (2013) and Friman et al. (2013). This will be demonstrated using factor analyses and Cronbach’s alphas.”
Travel-based multitasking: review of the empirical evidence (2018, background): “Thirdly, the ability tomultitask in vehicles has an impact on well-being (Ettema et al., 2012) and productivity in the work context (Gripsrud & Hjorthol, 2012).”
Travel satisfaction revisited : on the pivotal role of travel satisfaction in conceptualizing a travel behavior process (2017, background): “Although these activities might improve the positive utility of travel, some of the activities performed during travel, such as relaxing, reading a book or listening to music, might be attempts to abate boredom (Ettema et al., 2012; Lyons et al., 2007; Mokhtarian et al., 2015).”
Commute happiness in Xi’an, China: Effects of commute mode, duration, and frequency (2018, background): “…are mostly from the U.S., Canada, and Europe (Abou-Zeid and Ben-Akiva, 2011; Abou-Zeid et al., 2012; Cantwell et al., 2009; Eriksson et al., 2013; Ettema et al., 2012; Lucas and Heady, 2002; Manaugh and ElGeneidy, 2013; Olsson et al., 2013; Ory et al., 2004; Páez and Whalen, 2010; St-Louis et…”
Commuting and wellbeing: a critical overview of the literature with implications for policy and future research (2019, background): “for many workers (Ettema et al., 2010). Ettema et al. (2011) proposed a measurement scale for travel satisfaction (which has frequently been applied in studies of commuting travel), which includes both cognitive and affective components.”
Travel mode choice and travel satisfaction: bridging the gap between decision utility and experienced utility (2016, methodology): “Thus, the STS (Ettema et al. 2011) measures affect during travel and a cognitive evaluation of a trip made. The items measuring affect are based on the SCAS, which is based on Russell’s (1980), (2003) core affect approach and assumes that emotions can be decomposed into two underlying dimensions ref”
Walking (and cycling) to well-being: Modal and other determinants of subjective well-being during the commute (2018, background): “Furthermore, there is evidence that activity participation during travel (travelbased multitasking) may positively influence both positive travel affect and cognitive evaluations of travel satisfaction (Ettema et al., 2012; Rasouli & Timmermans, 2014a, 2014b; Rhee et al., 2013).”
Mood and mode: does how we travel affect how we feel? (2014, background): “Ettema et al. (2012), for example, find that of the various activities that can be performed during travel (such as relaxing or enjoying entertainment), talking to another passenger produces the highest satisfaction with travel, and Goulias et al. (2013) find that interacting with another while…”
Satisfaction with the commute: The role of travel mode choice, built environment and attitudes (2017, background): “…travel characteristics (e.g. travel mode choice, travel time, level of service, etc.) and satisfaction with travel (Abou-Zeid, 2009; Cao, 2013; Ettema et al., 2012; Friman and Fellesson, 2009; Gatersleben and Uzzell, 2007; Hine and Mitchell, 2001; Mokhtarian et al., 2014; Olsson et al., 2013;…”