Changing varieties of capitalism and revealed comparative advantages from 1990 to 2005: a test of the Hall and Soskice claims

By M. Schneider, Mihai Paunescu. 2012

242 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Political Science and International Relations, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/30c7cfbc6ca2c21e13c0d25b3e7c405ffe7f5adc

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

1. Michael A. Witt
2. Stav Fainshmidt
3. William Q. Judge
4. Ruth V. Aguilera
5. Gregory Jackson
6. J. Lee Brown III
7. G. Redding
8. Adam Smith

In Political Science and International Relations

1. Ruth V. Aguilera
2. Michael A. Witt
3. William Q. Judge
4. Stav Fainshmidt
5. Adam Smith
6. G. Redding
7. Gregory Jackson
8. J. Lee Brown III

In Strategy and Management

1. Ruth V. Aguilera
2. Michael A. Witt
3. William Q. Judge
4. Stav Fainshmidt
5. Gregory Jackson
6. J. Lee Brown III
7. G. Redding
8. Adam Smith

Citations in the corpus

• Varieties of Capitalism and institutional comparative advantage: A test and reinterpretation (2016, background): “…comparable measures of coordination such as that achieved through long-term relational contracts in buyer–supplier relations, prior literature (Schneider & Paunescu, 2012) suggested that mergers and acquisitions indicate that firms seek to obtain assets from target firms through a…”
• Asian Business Systems: Institutional Comparison, Clusters, and Implications for Varieties of Capitalism and Business Systems Theory (2013, background): “For instance, the proportion of stock market capitalization over GDP is often used as an indicator whether a business system is market or bank based (e.g., Hall and Gingerich, 2009; Schneider and Paunescu, 2012).”
• Varieties of institutional systems: A contextual taxonomy of understudied countries (2016, background): “…useful in explaining the nature and consequences of systemic variation, especially in developed economies (e.g., Witt & Redding, 2013; Hotho, 2014; Schneider & Paunescu, 2012), they are often not wellsuited for characterizing the increasingly significant group of newly-developed, emerging, and…”
• Varieties of entrepreneurship: exploring the institutional foundations of different entrepreneurship types through ‘Varieties-of-Capitalism’ arguments (2018, methodology): “Our country sample is composed in line with the original VoC literature (Hall and Soskice 2001: 20) and its bestknown developments (Amable 2003; Hancké et al. 2007; Molina and Rhodes 2007; Schneider and Paunescu 2012).”
• Mapping the business systems of 61 major economies: A taxonomy and implications for varieties of capitalism and business systems research (2018, methodology): “Our paper followed precedent in the literature by proxying the propensity of societies to rely on network forms of organization, rather than markets or hierarchies, through a comparative measure of M&A deals (Schneider and Paunescu, 2012; Witt and Jackson, 2016).”
• Varieties of coal-fired power phase-out across Europe (2019, result): “Empirical studies have confirmed the above distinctions (Hall and Gingerich, 2009; Schneider and Paunescu, 2012).”
• From Typology to Taxonomy: A Configurational Analysis of National Business Systems and their Explanatory Power (2014, methodology): “…hybrid clusters that are difficult to interpret from a Varieties of Capitalism perspective, configurational scholars often call for more nuanced institutional approaches to investigations of the link between institutions and outcomes (e.g., Schneider & Paunescu, 2012; Schneider et al., 2010).”
• Which model of capitalism best delivers both wealth and equality? (2014, methodology): “Stability of Configurations Recent research has questioned the stability of institutional configurations over time (e.g., Schneider & Paunescu, 2012).”