Paradoxes and the Nature of Ambidexterity in IT Transformation Programs

By Robert Wayne Gregory, Mark Keil, Jan Muntermann, Magnus Mähring. Information systems research, 2015

317 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Information Systems, Management Information Systems, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/307f627e48a73563772e29020be8160d238a0452

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Management Information Systems

1. Lars Mathiassen
2. Rikard Lindgren
3. Fredrik Svahn
4. Abayomi Baiyere

In Sociology and Political Science

1. Lars Mathiassen
2. Rikard Lindgren
3. Fredrik Svahn
4. Abayomi Baiyere
5. Tina Blegind Jensen

Citations in the corpus

• Embracing Digital Innovation in Incumbent Firms: How Volvo Cars Managed Competing Concerns (2017, background): “While Gregory et al. (2015) identify concerns managers must resolve in IT transformation programs, they primarily address intra-organizational situations rather than those interorganizational arrangements that characterize digital innovation.”
• Unpacking the Difference Between Digital Transformation and IT-Enabled Organizational Transformation (2021, background): “…that researchers in management (Mintzberg & McHugh, 1985; Mintzberg & Waters, 1985; Pettigrew, 1987, 1990) and IS have already scrutinized for decades (Barrett & Walsham, 1999; Berente et al., 2016; Gregory et al., 2015; Henderson & Venkatraman, 1992; Lyytinen & Newman, 2008; Orlikowski, 1996).”