A cognitive-pragmatic approach to situation-bound utterances

151 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Literal salience in on-line processing of idiomatic expressions by second language learners (2006, background): “Kecskes (2000) has suggested that, due to the lack of metaphorical competence in L2, second language users are more likely to rely on literal meanings of figurative utterances and on their L1 conceptual system when producing and comprehending figurative phrases (situation-bound utterances in…”
The pragmatic fossilization of discourse markers in non-native speakers of English☆ (2002, unknown): “1 See Kecskes and Papp (2000), ch.”
Situation-bound utterances as pragmatic acts (2010, background): “…(Goffman, 1967) ‘‘routine formulae’’ (Coulmas, 1981) ‘‘énoncés liés’’ (Fónagy, 1982), ‘‘situational utterances’’ (Kiefer, 1985, 1995), ‘‘bound utterances’’ (Kiefer, 1995), ‘‘institutionalized expressions’’ (Nattinger and DeCarrico, 1992), and ‘‘situation-bound utterances’’ (Kecskes, 1997, 2000).”
The Processing of Formulaic Sequences by Second Language Speakers. (2007, background): “…research, often from different perspectives, such as the identification and classification of formula uses from a functional or pragmatic perspective (Girard & Sionis, 2003, 2004; Kecskes, 2000) and the role of formulas in L2 acquisition in the tense-aspect context (e.g., Bardovi-Harlig, 2002).”