Single-Sex Versus Coeducational Schooling: A Systematic Review. Doc # 2005-01.

By Fred A. Mael, Àlex Alonso, Doug Gibson, Kelly Rogers, Mark Smith. 2005

134 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Single-Sex Schools, Student Achievement, and Course Selection: Evidence from Rule-Based Student Assignments in Trinidad and Tobago (2011, unknown): “In describing the 2221 studies on single-sex schooling, a meta-1 analysis (Mael, et al. 2005) conducted by the US Department of Education in 2005 states: "According to the guidelines of the [What Works Clearinghouse] WWC, all studies other than randomized controlled trials, quasi-experimental…”
Peer Effects in Microenvironments: The Benefits of Homogeneous Classroom Groups (2014, background): “Morse ð1998Þ and Mael et al. ð2005Þ review observational studies comparing students in single-sex and coeducational classes; some studies suggest that single-sex schoolingmay be beneficial while others indicate no difference.”
Gender, Single-Sex Schooling and Maths Achievement (2012, result): “…recently funded a prime time TV special called ‘‘i.am.first: cience is Rock and Roll’’ designed to get students, and young girls in 4 Guiso et al. (2008) report similar results, while Pope and Sydnor articular, excited about learning STEM skills (science, technology, ngineering and math).”