Cross‐culturally recurrent personality factors: analyses of three factors

By Boele de Raad, D. Peabody. 2005

122 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Clinical Psychology, Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/2ee2585e825511afefcdfbf4d4957447194d1270

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Clinical Psychology

In Social Psychology

In Sociology and Political Science

Citations in the corpus

The Circumplex of Personality Metatraits: A Synthesizing Model of Personality Based on the Big Five (2014, background): “…systematic taxonomic comparisons of over a dozen different languages have shown that only the first three factors (Extraversion, Agreeableness, and Conscientiousness) may be deemed fully replicable (De Raad et al., 2010; cf. De Raad & Peabody, 2005; Di Blas & Forzi, 1999; Peabody & Goldberg, 1989).”
Morality and intergroup relations: Threats to safety and group image predict the desire to interact with outgroup and ingroup members☆ (2013, background): “…has been confirmed by research at the interpersonal level, showing that people treat person defining traits related to sociability as distinct from traits related to morality (Ashton & Lee, 2001; De Raad & Peabody, 2005; see also Trafimow, Reeder, & Bilsing, 2001; Trafimow & Trafimow, 1999).”
Looking for honesty: The primary role of morality (vs. sociability and competence) in information gathering (2011, result): “…this argument, Leach et al. (2007) referred to previous work at the interpersonal level (Anderson & Sedikides, 1991; see also Ashton & Lee, 2001; De Raad & Peabody, 2005; Trafimow, Reeder, & Bilsing, 2001; Trafimow & Trafimow, 1999) showing that people treat personality traits related to…”
Behavioral genetics of the higher-order factors of the Big Five (2006, methodology): “For example, Digman (1997) consistently extracted two higher-order factors he called ‘‘alpha’’ (a) and ‘‘beta’’ (b) from several sets of published intercorrelations between these factors. Alpha was typically defined by factor loadings from A, C and ES whereas beta was delineated by loadings from Ex ”
Towards A Pan–Cultural Personality Structure: Input from 11 Psycholexical Studies (2014, background): “…and psychometric) was found for a coherent three-factor structure with the preceding meaning than for a structure with more factors (De Raad & Peabody, 2005; De Raad, Perugini, Hrébicková, & Szarota, 1998; De Raad, Perugini, & Szirmák, 1997; Hofstee, Kiers, De Raad, Goldberg, &…”