OIDDE Learning Model: Improving Higher Order Thinking Skills of Biology Teacher Candidates.
By H. Husamah, D. Fatmawati, Dwi Setyawan. 2018
115 citations recorded by the source corpus.
As the massive advancement in 21st century, the role of education is to prepare generations in mastering the skills they need to face the challenges arised in their era. OIDDE is the abbreviation for Orientation, Identify, Discussion, Decision, and Engage in behaviour. The learning model designed by Hudha et al. (2016) is expected to be able to guide the learners to achieve Higher Order Thinking Skills (HOTS) in term of producing proper and wise decisions through the certain steps which enable them to comprehend the facts faced and engage the decision resulted in their behaviour. This research provides the information of how OIDDE can stimulate the students’ higher order thinking skills by assessing the three aspects thinking skills namely: self-regulated thinking, critical thinking, and creative thinking. This research employed Classroom Action Research (CAR) method conducted in two cycles which comprise of four meetings with duration of 3 × 50 minutes for each cycle. The participants were 45 biology education students in fifth semester.
Subfields: Education
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/2dda25b634b5e3e096ce496103960f31fe48fa1e
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Education
Citations in the corpus
- Improving Students’ Critical Thinking Skills in Cell-Metabolism Learning Using Stimulating Higher Order Thinking Skills Model (2019, methodology): “The use of the model is the preferred way to solve problems related to the low students' critical-thinking skills in Biology learning at the high school in Surakarta, Indonesia because the model can be easily applied in classroom learning (Husamah et al., 2018).”
- The Practicality and Effectiveness of Collaborative Creativity Learning (CCL) Model by Using PhET Simulation to Increase Students’ Scientific Creativity (2018, result): “This is supported by the results of the study (Astutik, 2015; Astutik, 2018; Erika et al., 2018; Husamah et al, 2018; Limatahu et al., 2018; Madeali & Prahani, 2018; Prahani et al., 2016; Prahani et al., 2018; Purwaningsih et al., 2018; Suprapto et al., 2018; Suyidno et al., 2017) that the learning…”