How to Do Things with Words之脉络分析
By 蒋家义. 2009
Subfields: Natural Language Processing
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Natural Language Processing
- Phil Blunsom
- Jacob Eisenstein
- Nal Kalchbrenner
- Kyunghyun Cho
- Su Lin Blodgett
- Graham Neubig
- Hinrich Schütze
- Umashanthi Pavalanathan
Citations in the corpus
- Experience Grounds Language (2020, neutral): “Austin’s “performative speech acts” (Austin, 1975).”
- Stereotyping Norwegian Salmon: An Inventory of Pitfalls in Fairness Benchmark Datasets (2021, background): “Auditing NLP systems for computational harms like the reproduction of stereotypes or hate speech remains a persistent challenge, due in no small part to the deeply contextual and open nature of language use and tasks (Austin, 1975; Clark, 1996; Howcroft et al., 2020; Abid et al., 2021; Olteanu et al”
- Recurrent Convolutional Neural Networks for Discourse Compositionality (2013, background): “A dialogue act specifies the pragmatic role of an utterance and helps identifying the speaker’s intentions (Austin, 1962; Korta and Perry, 2012).”
- A corpus linguistics study of SMS text messaging (2009, background): “tend to frame speech acts such as requests, demands and warnings (Austin 1962).”
- Limits of Generalizing in Education Research: Why Criteria for Research Generalization Should Include Population Heterogeneity and Uses of Knowledge Claims (2014, unknown): “Any statement is true and appropriate for some uses (intents and purposes) while it is false for others (Austin, 1962/1975).”
- Pragmatics of Taste (2007, unknown): “This switch is expressed equally vigorously in the present, synchronously: it is the word pragmatic that coveys it perfectly this time (Austin 1962, and on popular culture, Shusterman 1992).”
- The psychology of coordination and common knowledge. (2014, background): “Another class of common-knowledge generators consists of performatives (Austin, 1962; Searle, 1989) and the associated phenomenon of public ceremonies, in which the public utterance of a proposition (e.g., “I now pronounce you man and wife”) ratifies a new coordination equilibrium such as a…”
- Functions of the Nonverbal in CMC: Emoticons and Illocutionary Force (2010, background): “Austin (1962) in his book How to do things with words.”
- Emoticons vs. Emojis on Twitter: A Causal Inference Approach (2015, background): “Specifically, Dresner and Herring (2010) draw concepts from speech act theory (Austin 1975) and argue that emoticons are indications of the speaker’s intentions, the illocutionary force of the accompanied textual utterances.”
- Teacher Identity in the Context of Literacy Teaching: Three Explorations of Classroom Positioning and Interaction in Secondary Schools (2010, background): “have documented, language use serves as a way for people to learn what is or is not valued within a community, establish social identities for themselves and others, develop understandings about texts, and gain access to tools that can facilitate their reading comprehension or production of written ”