Does the balance scorecard work: an empirical investigation
By Andy Neely. 2008
110 citations recorded by the source corpus.
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/1e8efa537c9ee36177a0196b4fe7bb2604bfb86c
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- Patrizia Garengo
- Carla Maria Marques Curado
- Umit Sezer Bititci
- John Dumay
- L. Henriques
- Nick Bontis
- Sai S. Nudurupati
- T. Turner
Citations in the corpus
- Grand theories as barriers to using IC concepts (2012, background): “However, it has often been criticised for its inability to make the causal links between intangibles and profitability as its claims to success are more or less anecdotal rather than empirically proven ( Neely, 2008”
- Intellectual capital disclosure payback (2011, background): “The literature has focused on how to reverse the problems of other performance management reporting systems by suggesting replacing them by different frameworks (Neely et al., 2004).”
- Dynamics of performance measurement and organizational culture (2006, background): “On the other hand, emerging literature suggests that the use of performance measurement systems, such as the balanced scorecard, does not make any difference to business performance ( Neely et al., 2004; Ittner et al., 2003).”