Lending relationships in line-of-credit and nonline-of-credit loans: Evidence from collateral use in small business
By A. Chakraborty, C. X. Hu. 2006
205 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Accounting, Finance, Management Information Systems
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/2d186e7fbae2e1cfd3013ec151d1a7a25dd16564
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Accounting
- Tensie Steijvers
- Wim Voordeckers
- Koen Vanhoof
- Ivan E. Brick
- J. Maudos
- Darius N Palia
- Juan Fernández de Guevara
- Abdur Rouf
In Finance
- J. Maudos
- Juan Fernández de Guevara
- Wim Voordeckers
- Tensie Steijvers
- Koen Vanhoof
- Darius N Palia
- Ivan E. Brick
- Laurent Weill
In Management Information Systems
Citations in the corpus
- Do banks price discriminate spatially? Evidence from small business lending in local credit markets (2013, unknown): “The result contrasts arguments advanced by Boot and Thakor (1994), Petersen and Rajan (1994), Berger and Udell (1995), Chakraborty and Hu (2006), Brick and Palia (2007) and Sakai et al. (2010).”
- Who Needs Credit and Who Gets Credit? Evidence from the Surveys of Small Business Finances (2016, unknown): “- 5 - Chakraborty and Hu (2006) use data from the 1993 SSBF to analyze how relationships affect lender’s decision to secure lines of credit and other types of loans.”
- Collateral, relationship lending and family firms (2010, background): “These results are probably an indication that total assets are a determinant for the choice between L/C and non-L/C loans ( Chakraborty and Hu 2006 ).”
- Banking competition, financial dependence and economic growth (2006, result): “These results, though in conflict with the recent evidence contributed by Claessens and Laeven (2004), are in agreement with recent contributions in the field of relationship banking which show that the banks with monopoly power have greater incentives to establish relationships with their clients b”
- Mutual guarantee institutions and small business finance (2008, unknown): “Moreover, as underlined by Berger and Udell (1995) and by Chakraborty and Hu (2006), the asymmetric information problems are more relevant for overdraft loans that, because of their nature, are less influenced by the particular projects financed.”
- Evidence of jointness in the terms of relationship lending (2007, background): “…are: Angelini et al. (1998), Bebczuk (2004), Berger et al. (2003), Blackwell and Winters (1997), Bodenhorn (2003), Canovas and Solano (2003), Chakraborty and Hu (2006), Cole (1998), Cole et al. (2004), Conigliani et al. (1997), Cosci and Meliciani (2002), D'Auria et al. (1999), Degryse and…”