Determinants of wordlikeness: Phonotactics or lexical neighborhoods?

By Todd M. Bailey, Ulrike Hahn. 2001

372 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/2cfcb0fc4545f18a955874f8aae42f232d001351

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cognitive Neuroscience

In Developmental and Educational Psychology

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

Citations in the corpus

Phonological Neighborhood Effects in Spoken Word Perception and Production (2016, background): “Although our research may have influenced work to discover the basic rules that define a word (e.g., Albright 2007, Bailey & Hahn 2001, Frisch et al. 2000, Hahn & Bailey 2005), an in-depth discussion of that literature is beyond the scope of this review.”
Phoneme similarity and confusability (2005, background): “In a study of wordlikeness, Bailey and Hahn (2001) found that even their best measure of lexical influence left most of the item variance unexplained.”
A Maximum Entropy Model of Phonotactics and Phonotactic Learning (2008, methodology): “Our own inductive baseline is a purely linear, feature-bundle approach modeled on Chomsky and Halle 1968 (henceforth SPE).”
Phonological development: toward a “radical” templatic phonology (2007, background): “…has shown that language users are highly sensitive to the phonotactic regularities implicit in the lexicon (Vitevich et al. 1997; Vitevich and Luce 1998, 1999; Frisch 2000; Frisch et al. 2000; Frisch and Zawaydeh 2001; Treiman et al. 2000; Bailey and Hahn 2001; see also Pierrehumbert 2003b).”
Increases in phonotactic probability facilitate spoken nonword repetition. (2005, background): “The influence of phonotactic probability has been observed in many other studies using different tasks, different stimulus materials, different stimulus tokens, different dependent measures, different populations, and different measures of phonotactic probability (e.g., Bailey & Hahn, 2001; Fritch”
Phonological sequence learning and short-term store capacity determine second language vocabulary acquisition (2004, background): “These three phenomena suggest that short-term memory performance is enhanced by wordlikeness and that this effect is dependent on long-term phonological knowledge which is derived from prior lexical experience (Bailey & Hahn, 2001; Metsala & Walley, 1998).”
Natural and Unnatural Constraints in Hungarian Vowel Harmony (2009, result): “Some other phonological experiments whose results support this law are reported in Eddington 1996, 1998, 2004, Coleman & Pierrehumbert 1997, Berkley 2000, Zuraw 2000, Bailey & Hahn 2001, Frisch & Zawaydeh 2001, Albright 2002, Albright & Hayes 2003, Pierrehumbert 2006, and Jun & Lee 2007.”
Grammaticality and Ungrammaticality in Phonology (2008, background): “…evidence from the literature that nonwords with high values for their frequency statistics usually receive higher word-likeness ratings than non-words with lower values (Bailey and Hahn 1998, 2001; Coleman and Pierrehumbert 1997; Frisch et al. 2001; Pierrehumbert et al. 2004; Treiman et al. 2000).”
A Web-based interface to calculate phonotactic probability for words and nonwords in English (2004, background): “For example, in studies seeking to identify the exact determinates of " wordlikeness " (Bailey & Hahn, 2001), additional assumptions and constraints may need to be included to account for increasing amounts of variability in the dependent measure of " wordlikeness.”