The Rules of Standard Setting Organizations: An Empirical Analysis

By Benjamin Chiao, Josh Lerner, Jean Tirole. 2007

248 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Management of Technology and Innovation, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/2cdead031afbcd0c7d74fcb5fa3f7726fa52ba37

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Management of Technology and Innovation

In Strategy and Management

Citations in the corpus

An Empirical Study on the Determinants of Essential Patent Claims in Compatibility Standards (2011, background): “irm strategies for patents in standards receive increasing interest n the academic community, including contributions from Lemley 2002), Chiao et al. (2007), and Simcoe et al.”
Is There a Market for Ideas (2010, unknown): “…the potential to overcome the coordination problem involved in selling overlapping ideas, and seem to serve as a mechanism in which a single (aggregate) seller encourages participation by potential buyers through the availability of “one-stop shopping” (Lerner and Tirole, 2004; Chiao et al., 2007).”
Competing on Standards? Entrepreneurship, Intellectual Property, and Platform Technologies (2009, unknown): “To reduce bargaining costs and promote the adoption of completed standards, most SSOs offer their members a quid pro quo: in return for the opportunity to promote their proprietary technology, firms must disclose relevant IP, and if it becomes part of the standard, offer a nonexclusive license at “r”
Convergence in Environmental Reporting: Assessing the Carbon Disclosure Project (2013, unknown): “Much of the standardization process and its value have been observed in the technology and communications industries (e.g., Chiao et al., 2007); (Schmalensee, 2009).”
Competing Through Cooperation: The Organization of Standard Setting in Wireless Telecommunications (2008, background): “For example, Chiao et al. (2006) have collected comparative data from 60 standards-development organizations (SDOs) and found that, although specific governance arrangements vary, committee-based standard setting covers dozens of electronics industries.1 In response, a stream of empirical research…”
Patents and the Performance of Voluntary Standard-Setting Organizations (2008, background): “For example, Chiao et al. (2007) cite concerns that disclosure may reveal sensitive information about a firm’s R&D strategy or spur efforts to “invent around” a particularly strong patent.”
Standard-Essential Patents (2015, unknown): “1995), the ground rules adopted by these organizations, particularly in regard to the extent to which it is oriented to technology developers or end users (Chiao et al. 2007), and the composition of standard-setting working groups (Simcoe 2011).”