Towards the utilization of EEG as a brain imaging tool

By C. Michel, Micah M. Murray. NeuroImage, 2012

720 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/9483620e9d151468f27862b68ce4d42294c77cea

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Citations in the corpus

EEG Source Imaging: A Practical Review of the Analysis Steps (2019, background): “In experimental studies, EEG source imaging has become standard to localize different brain areas involved in sensory, motor, and cognitive functions, most often applied to eventrelated potentials (89, 96).”
EEG and MEG: relevance to neuroscience. (2013, unknown): “The latter form the material core of cognitive functions.”
Identifying and Quantifying Multisensory Integration: A Tutorial Review (2014, background): “A particularly powerful set of analyses is referred to as electrical neuroimaging (Michel and Murray 2012).”
The efficacy of single-trial multisensory memories. (2013, methodology): “Finally, we used electrical neuroimaging analyses of event-related potentials (e.g. Michel et al., 2004; Murray et al., 2008; Michel and Murray, 2012; Tzovara et al., 2012a,b) to provide adequate spatio-temporal resolution to garner information concerning when and where such effects first occur…”
Functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy (fNIRS) for Assessing Cerebral Cortex Function During Human Behavior in Natural/Social Situations: A Concise Review (2019, unknown): “It is noteworthy to mention that the most recent mobile EEG systems have the great advantage, with respect to fNIRS, to be miniaturized (Bleichner et al., 2015; Debener, Emkes, De Vox, & Bleichner, 2015; Debener, Minow, Emkes, Gandras, & de Vos, 2012).”
Microstates in Resting-State EEG: Current Status and Future Directions (2014, background): “Conclusions EEG is a relatively inexpensive technique with high temporal resolution that provides snapshots of brain electrical activity and readily complements other neuroimaging (Michel and Murray, 2012).”
Advances in multimodal data fusion in neuroimaging: Overview, challenges, and novel orientation (2020, unknown): “However, their spatial esolution/uncertainty is more than several millimeters [15, 16] .”
Contextual factors multiplex to control multisensory processes (2016, background): “…in the configuration of these generators (viz. the topography of the electric field at the scalp), as well as latency shifts in brain processes across experimental conditions [Altieri et al., 2015; Michel and Murray, 2012; Michel et al., 2004, 2009; Murray et al., 2008; Stevenson et al., 2014].”
Simultaneous invasive and non-invasive recordings in humans: A novel Rosetta stone for deciphering brain activity (2024, unknown): “Finally, when considering spatial alignment methods for scalp EEG recordings, during data acquisition the choice between using a pen-like pointer such as a Polhemus system or a camera-based system should be carefully considered (Michel and Murray, 2012).”
Age-related neural dynamics of empathy in preschoolers: an EEG study with naturalistic viewing (2026, unknown): “While spectral analysis indexes local processing efficiency (e.g. theta and alpha oscillations; Pineda 2005, Kienitz et al. 2018), it cannot capture large-scale state transitions (Michel and Murray 2012).”
Periodic and aperiodic neural activity displays age-dependent changes across early-to-middle childhood (2021, background): “Resting-sate EEG recordings can be used to capture spontaneous, or ‘intrinsic’ activity that occurs in the absence of any overt external stimuli, or task-related neurocognitive processing (Buzsáki et al., 2012; Michel & Murray, 2012).”