Testing Multitheoretical, Multilevel Hypotheses About Organizational Networks: An Analytic Framework and Empirical Example
By Noshir S. Contractor, Stanley Wasserman, Katherine Faust. 2006
488 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Statistical and Nonlinear Physics, Strategy and Management
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/2c93d861dc0c1ab3d753c94826a9b68a20c768e3
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Statistical and Nonlinear Physics
- Emily Cox Pahnke
- Steven L. Johnson
- Samer Faraj
- Stephen P. Borgatti
- Junlong Zhang
- Ji Youn Kim
- Yubin Luo
- Michael D. Howard
In Strategy and Management
- Steven L. Johnson
- Emily Cox Pahnke
- Samer Faraj
- Stephen P. Borgatti
- M. Hilton
- Nancy J. Cooke
- Warren Boeker
- C. Behavioral
Citations in the corpus
- Network Exchange Patterns in Online Communities (2011, background): “Although an individual may have different, potentially conflicting, propensities to act on selfless or selfish intrinsic motivations, exchange theory finds that when faced with similar structural constraints, individuals act—in aggregate, if not individually—in a consistent, predictable manner.”
- What's Different about Social Media Networks? A Framework and Research Agenda (2014, background): “Contemporary research on both interpersonal (Borgatti et al. 2009; Brass et al. 2004; Burt 2000; Contractor et al. 2006) and information technology (IT)-enabled (Alavi and Kane 2008; Fulk 1993; Hiltz and Turoff 1993; Rice and Love 1987) social networks offers a diverse repertoire of theories and…”
- Enhancing the Effectiveness of Team Science (2015, background): “Contractor et al. (2014) conducted a study of student teams focusing on how they were assembled.”
- Understanding network formation in strategy research: Exponential random graph models (2016, background): “However, this assumption can be problematic for many networks, in which new tie formation is an interdependent process influenced by both the characteristics of the actors and of their existing ties (Ahuja et al., 2012; Contractor et al., 2006; Provan, Fish, and Sydow, 2007).”
- Degree Centrality, Betweenness Centrality, and Closeness Centrality in Social Network (2017, background): “Under this paradigm, more and more social actors and relations are analyzed [4].”