Network Exchange Patterns in Online Communities
By Samer Faraj, Steven L. Johnson. Organ. Sci., 2011
347 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Communication, Statistical and Nonlinear Physics
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/00247eae05112a6955792a10334139c9289796f7
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Communication
Citations in the corpus
- Internal Social Capital and the Attraction of Early Contributions in Crowdfunding (2015, background): “Second, a proponent benefits from a norm of generalized reciprocity within the online community built around the platform when he or she has backed many projects in the past (Faraj & Johnson, 2011; Portes, 1998).”
- Serial Crowdfunding, Social Capital, and Project Success (2017, background): “If so, these backers may support the campaign to avoid jeopardizing their reputation and to prevent retaliation (Faraj & Johnson, 2011).”
- Understanding consumer intention to participate in online travel community and effects on consumer intention to purchase travel online and WOM: An integration of innovation diffusion theory and TAM with trust (2016, neutral): “…sunk cost theory (Tiwana & Bush, 2005); the technology acceptance model (Venkatesh, 2000); theories of social networks and Social Network Analysis (Faraj & Johnson, 2011; Toral, Martínez-Torres, & Barrero, 2010); critical mass theory (Raban, Moldovan, & Jones, 2010); and resource-based theory…”
- The Contradictory Influence of Social Media Affordances on Online Communal Knowledge Sharing (2013, neutral): “Preferential attachment is one such mechanism that may get activated with negative consequences (Barabasi, 2003; Faraj & Johnson, 2011).”