A Practical Guide To Factorial Validity Using PLS-Graph: Tutorial And Annotated Example

By David Gefen, Detmar W. Straub Jr.. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 2005

3,651 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Management Information Systems, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/2c8b8e0b09dde3feae248e5ace6411ae60cb47ab

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Artificial Intelligence

In Management Information Systems

In Strategy and Management

Citations in the corpus

Data Collection in the Digital Age: Innovative Alterantives to Student Samples (2014, background): “All of the data samples provide further evidence of convergent and divergent validity as each item loads primarily on its focal construct while having lesser loadings on all other constructs within the analysis (Gefen and Straub 2005 ).”
What Does the Brain Tell Us About Trust and Distrust? Evidence from a Functional Neuroimaging Study (2010, methodology): “For exploratory factor analysis (EFA), the principal components factor analysis in SPSS with promax rotation was used; for confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), the CFA procedure in PLS Graph and LISREL (Gefen and Straub 2005) was used.”
Assessing the impact of big data on firm innovation performance: Big data is not always better data (2020, background): “As recommended by Gefen and Straub (2005), to further ensure the validity of the second-order variables, we evaluated the outer model loadings and their weights.”
Donate Time or Money? The Determinants of Donation Intention in Online Crowdfunding (2019, methodology): “Compared to the covariance-based structural equation modeling (SEM), the component-based partial least squares (PLS) has no strict requirements about the sample size and distribution [76].”
Technostress creators and job outcomes: theorising the moderating influence of personality traits (2015, neutral): “Validity and Reliability © 2015 Wiley Publishing Ltd, Information Systems Journal 25, 355–401 constructs in the model (Gefen & Straub, 2005).”
Adoption of artificial intelligence in higher education: a quantitative analysis using structural equation modelling (2020, background): “If it is found that AVof each construct is more than the correlation coefficients of that construct with other constructs, we say discriminant validity test has been established (Gefen and Straub 2005).”
Protection motivation and deterrence: a framework for security policy compliance in organisations (2009, background): “To test discriminant validity, the extent to which different constructs diverge from one another, the square root of the Average Variance Extracted (AVE) of the multi-item reflective constructs should be greater than the absolute value of the inter-construct correlations (Gefen & Straub, 2005).”
Hotel image and reputation on building customer loyalty: An empirical study in Macau (2019, background): “According to Gray and Balmer (1998), the corporate image comprises the immediate mental picture that audiences have of an organization.”
Conceptualizing and testing formative constructs: tutorial and annotated example (2009, methodology): “We also conducted a CFA in PLS to further establish convergent and discriminant validity of our reflective constructs (Gefen and Straub 2005).”
The Application of the Technology Acceptance Model under Different Cultural Contexts: The Case of Online Shopping Adoption (2014, positive): “Thus, our measurements satisfy the criteria for discriminant validity suggested by Chin (1998) and Gefen and Straub (2005).”