Acceptability of Urban Transport Pricing

By J. Schade, B. Schlag. 2000

125 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/2c830e9462ff5d89cfd3c54d25dabad4ce61c5de

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Citations in the corpus

Reactance or acceptance? Reactions towards the introduction of road pricing (2007, background): “We tested the opposite predictions of reactance and dissonance theory, two popular psychological theories, with regard to the responses of car drivers to the introduction of the road pricing.”
Political and Public Acceptability of Congestion Pricing: Ideology and Self Interest (2010, unknown): “…analyses of public acceptance of pricing are based on the stated preferences of consumers in sample surveys (e.g., the surveys of European consumers reported by Schade & Schlag, 2000, and Jones, 2003, or the surveys of California commuters analyzed by Harrington, Krupnick, & Alberini, 1998).”
Explaining differences in acceptability before and acceptance after the implementation of a congestion charge in Stockholm (2010, background): “Both acceptability and acceptance of road pricing schemes reflect an attitude towards these schemes (e.g., Bamberg and Rölle, 2003; Eriksson et al., 2006, 2008; Gärling et al., 2008; Jakobsson et al., 2000; Schade and Schlag, 2000).”
Public Acceptability of Road User Charging: The Case of Edinburgh and the 2005 Referendum (2007, background): “Bartley, 1995; Luk and Chung, 1997; Schade and Schlag, 2000; Link and Polak, 2001) have demonstrated considerable public resistance to RUC elsewhere in Europe and beyond.”
Why are Energy Policies Acceptable and Effective? (2006, background): “…pricing (e.g., Arkensteijn & Oerlemans, 2005; Jakobsson, Fujii, & Gärling, 2000; Loukopoulos, Jakobsson, Gärling, Schneider, & Fujii, 2005; Schade & Schlag, 2000, 2003; Schlag & Teubel, 1997; Schuitema, 2003; Stern, Dietz, & Kalof, 1993) and energy use (L. Steg, Dreijerink, & Abrahamse,…”
The role of revenue use in the acceptability of transport pricing policies (2008, background): “Schade and Schlag (2000a, 2000b) examined acceptability ratings of three packages of pricing policies in four European cities.”
Explaining Variations in Public Acceptability of Road Pricing Schemes (2005, background): “A few studies have presented a level of charge (Schade and Schlag, 2000; PATS Consortium, 2001) but, with one notable exception (Harrington et al., 2001), no quantified relationship between acceptance and the charge has been developed”