Comprehension of Discourse-Linked and Non-Discourse-Linked Questions by Children and Broca's Aphasics
By S. Avrutin. 2000
143 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Language and Linguistics
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/2c225b48c8aba63ca9d48f47f6435ed4596e148e
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Cognitive Neuroscience
- Naama Friedmann
- Rama Novogrodsky
- H. V. D. van der Lely
- Jackie Battell
- Michael T. Ullman
- Chloe R. Marshall
- S. Ebbels
In Developmental and Educational Psychology
- Rama Novogrodsky
- Naama Friedmann
- H. V. D. van der Lely
- Jackie Battell
- Michael T. Ullman
- Chloe R. Marshall
- S. Ebbels
In Language and Linguistics
Citations in the corpus
- Which questions are most difficult to understand?: The comprehension of Wh questions in three subtypes of SLI (2011, background): “On this basis, Avrutin (2000) suggested that the delay in the (which girl, for example), so that when the intervening element is also referential (grandma), it is of the same type as the which phrase, and therefore blocks the assignment of the thematic role to the moved which phrase.”
- Wh-Movement in Children with Grammatical SLI: A Test of the RDDR Hypothesis (2003, background): “…comprehension requiring extraction of the referential DP, but good performance on questions that did not require pied piping, such as who questions, Avrutin (2000) suggests that the problem resides in processing limitations since such sentences require discourse operations as well as syntactic…”