Coronal mass ejections, interplanetary ejecta and geomagnetic storms

By H. Cane, I. G. Richardson, O. S. Cyr. 2000

223 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/2b992cd42e669710564255f93423bd931c3de15e

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Astronomy and Astrophysics

Citations in the corpus

Coronal Mass Ejections: Observations (2012, background): “The source regions of frontside halo CMEs are likely to be located within a few tens of degrees of Sun center from the perspective of the observer (Cane et al., 2000; Webb, 2002; Gopalswamy, 2004; Gopalswamy et al., 2010b).”
Iron Charge Distribution as an Identifier of Interplanetary Coronal Mass Ejections (2001, methodology): “The ICMEs were identified completely independently of the Fe charge state analysis by considering a range of ICME signatures [e.g., Gosling, 1990; Richardson and Cane, 1995; Cane et al., 2000].”
Deflection of coronal mass ejection in the interplanetary medium (2004, unknown): “Printed in the Netherlands. halo CMEs, magnetic clouds (MCs), and geomagnetic storms, and suggested that the halo CMEs associated with solar activity within 0.5 R of Sun center appear to be excellent indicators of increased geoactivity 3–5 days later.”
Sources of geomagnetic activity during nearly three solar cycles (2002, background): “(For example, it may not include enhanced southward-directed magnetic fields [Cane et al., 2000].”
Identification of Solar Sources of Major Geomagnetic Storms between 1996 and 2000 (2003, methodology): “…fixed time window method has been conveniently used by other workers to relate LASCO CMEs with geomagnetic storms (Brueckner et al. 1998; Webb et al. 2000) or CME counterparts in interplanetary space (Gopalswamy et al. 2000; Cane et al. 2000); the transit time has been found to be from 1 to 5 days.”
A survey of interplanetary coronal mass ejections in the near-Earth solar wind during 1996-2002 (2003, background): “Although the CME speeds are projected against the plane of the sky and do not represent the true Earthward-directed speeds of the CMEs, there is nonetheless some degree of correlation, as we have noted previously [Cane et al., 2000].”
A statistical study on the geoeffectiveness of Earth‐directed coronal mass ejections from March 1997 to December 2000 (2002, methodology): “It should be noted that the transit time used here was not the same as the other transit times which have been used in different authors’ works [e.g., Gopalswamy et al., 2000, 2001a; Cane et al., 2000].”
Solar and interplanetary sources of major geomagnetic storms during 1996–2002 (2004, methodology): “[15] A number of attempts have been made in recent years to predict the arrival time of CMEs at the Earth, for example, by Cane et al. [2000] and Gopalswamy et al. [2000, 2001a, 2001b]. Gopalswamy et al. [2000] proposed an empirical model to predict the arrival time of the CME.”
The association of coronal mass ejections with their effects near the Earth (2005, background): “Under 3) we encounter a pretty controversial issue (see Cane et al., 2000; Cane and Richardson, 2003b; and Gopalswamy et al., 2003).”