Multi-dimensional struggles in the greening of industry: A dialectic issue lifecycle model and case study

By C. Penna, Frank W. Geels. 2012

160 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering, Marketing, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/2b7321a124ce9652270809258e55f014ad29530b

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering

In Marketing

In Strategy and Management

Citations in the corpus

Climate change and the slow reorientation of the American car industry (1979–2012): An application and extension of the Dialectic Issue LifeCycle (DILC) model (2015, methodology): “Automakers did engage with air ollution regulations by introducing the three-way catalytic conerter innovation in 1983, but were generally not concerned about nvironmental issues (Penna and Geels, 2012).”
Reconceptualising the co-evolution of firms-in-industries and their environments: Developing an inter-disciplinary Triple Embeddedness Framework (2014, background): “With regard to the new agenda of grand societal challenges and reorientation of incumbent firms-in-industries, the TEF can be used to develop three guiding notions (Penna and Geels, 2012; Geels and Penna, 2013).”
The interplay of institutions, actors and technologies in socio-technical systems — An analysis of transformations in the Australian urban water sector (2016, background): “, 2012; Turnheim and Geels, 2013) or in the context of influencing sectoral discourses and rationales (Penna and Geels, 2012; Späth and Rohracher, 2010).”
Deep transitions: Emergence, acceleration, stabilization and directionality (2018, unknown): “, 2005; Smith and Stirling, 2007; Genus and Coles, 2008; Hodson and Marvin, 2010): these issues were taken up in subsequent studies (Van Driel and Schot, 2005; Geels, 2006, 2014; Elzen et al., 2011; Penna and Geels, 2012; Baker et al., 2014; Kanger and Schot, 2016).”
Bridging analytical approaches for low-carbon transitions (2016, unknown): “Transitions therefore commonly involve struggles including business struggles between incumbents and new entrants 23 (which involve industry structures, market power, alliances and strategies), discursive struggles in public debates 24 (which involve claims and counterclaims, framing contests, and…”
Navigators through the storm: A review of organization theories and the behavior of incumbent firms during transitions (2017, background): “Even within a particular transition, incumbents follow different modes of behavior (Bakker et al., 2014; Karltorp and Sandén, 2012; Penna and Geels, 2012), and change between modes of behavior over time (Bakker et al., 2014; Berggren et al., 2015; Smink et al., 2013; Wesseling et al., 2015, 2014).”
Keeping sustainable innovation on a leash? Exploring incumbents’ institutional strategies (2015, background): “Penna and Geels (2012) show that indeed a range of strategies exists beyond innovation and technology strategies.”
Disruption and low-carbon system transformation: Progress and new challenges in socio-technical transitions research and the Multi-Level Perspective (2017, background): “Some scholars provide broad reviews that additionally address the behavioural theory of the firm, resource dependence theory, organizational ecology, and resource-based view [49], as well as economic positioning, corporate political strategy, discursive strategy, issue management, sense-making [50,5”