Binary choice under instructions to select versus reject
By Margaret G. Meloy, J. Russo. 2004
97 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: General Decision Sciences, Safety Research, Sociology and Political Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/2b3615c9c32a405942f23b88e993847d06202d40
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In General Decision Sciences
- Alfred Kobsa
- Hongxia Jin
- Bart P. Knijnenburg
- J. Russo
- Samuel D. Bond
- Robin J. Tanner
- Kurt A. Carlson
- Margaret G. Meloy
In Safety Research
- Hongxia Jin
- Alfred Kobsa
- Bart P. Knijnenburg
- Samuel D. Bond
- Robin J. Tanner
- Kurt A. Carlson
- J. Russo
- Margaret G. Meloy
In Sociology and Political Science
- K. White
- Darren W. Dahl
- Bart P. Knijnenburg
- Hongxia Jin
- Alfred Kobsa
- Samuel D. Bond
- Robin J. Tanner
- Kurt A. Carlson
Citations in the corpus
- Counteracting the Negative Effect of Form Auto-completion on the Privacy Calculus (2013, methodology): “Despite the established behavioral differences between accept and reject frames (Ganzach 1995; Meloy and Russo 2004; Wedell 1997), we find that users in the Add condition disclose just as much as users in the Remove condition (Remove: 89.”
- To Be or Not Be? The Influence of Dissociative Reference Groups on Consumer Preferences (2006, background): “Similarly, research indicates that consumers can choose a brand by either selecting appropriate brands or by rejecting inappropriate brands (Meloy & Russo, 2004).”
- Information distortion in the evaluation of a single option (2007, methodology): “In order to track participants’ preferences as the decision task progressed, we utilized the stepwise evolution of preference (SEP) method drawn from previous work on binary choice (Meloy & Russo, 2004; Russo et al., 1998).”