Analysis of Control Architectures for Teleoperation Systems with Impedance/Admittance Master and Slave Manipulators
By Keyvan Hashtrudi-Zaad, Septimiu E. Salcudean. Int. J. Robotics Res., 2001
404 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Biomedical Engineering, Mechanical Engineering, Surgery
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/2afe2d947bb6afbfdcc8c52920afe2e4c75fc0b5
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Biomedical Engineering
In Mechanical Engineering
- H. V. D. Kooij
- Arno H. A. Stienen
- Arvid Q. L. Keemink
- Keyvan Hashtrudi-Zaad
- Septimiu E. Salcudean
- Romeo Ortega
- Luis Basañez
- Emmanuel Nuño
In Surgery
Citations in the corpus
- Transparency in time-delayed systems and the effect of local force feedback for transparent teleoperation (2002, methodology): “Using Llewellyn’s absolute stability criterion, one can show that the system stability is not guaranteed for all passive operator and environment [7], [15].”
- Admittance control for physical human–robot interaction (2018, methodology): “The latter fits the framework of the 4C Controller, as popularized by Lawrence (1993) and Hashtrudi-Zaad and Salcudean (2001).”
- Passivity-based control for bilateral teleoperation: A tutorial (2011, background): “…error controller, could stabilize the teleoperator with short time-delays if the controller gains are properly chosen Arcara and Melchiorri (2004), Hastrudi-Zaad and Salcudean (2001) and Lee and Lee (1993), and the use of a PD + d controller for teleoperators with constant time-delays has been…”